FTC Reports on Fighting Fraud in Minority Communities

On October 15, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced
that it had issued a report
outlining the impact of fraud on communities of Color (2021 Report). The report
follows a 2016
report to Congress (2016 Report) titled “Combating Fraud in
African-American and Latino Communities: The FTC’s Comprehensive Strategic
Plan.”  The 2021 Report provides an
update on the FTC’s efforts since the 2016 Report, include a broad view of the
types of issues under the FTC’s jurisdiction, and concludes with a road map for
moving forward.

In addition to providing research regarding communities of
color and a looking forward plan, the 2021 Report focuses on the following three
issues:

• FTC enforcement actions. Per the FTC, “Aggressive law enforcement is a key component of the FTC’s efforts to protect communities of color.”  This section of the 2021 Report includes details of more than 25 enforcement actions brought by the FTC in the last five years where the unlawful conduct either targeted or disproportionately affected communities of color, broken down into the following segments:

o  
Automobile Buying Issues

o  
Student Loan Debt Relief

o  
Marketing Prepaid Cards

o  
Government Impersonators

o  
Marketing for Inmate Services

o  
Deceptive and Unsubstantiated Advertising Claims

o  
Jobs and Money-Making Opportunities

o  
Credit, Background Checks, and Access to Housing

o  
Payday Loans and Debt Collection  

• Outreach and Education Initiatives to communities of color

• FTC Workshops and Industry Studies

[article_ad]

Findings

The 2021 Report found several critical differences in the way
that fraud and other consumer problems affect communities of color. For
example, it found that when people reported losing money, those living in
majority Black and Latino communities more often reported paying in ways with
few, if any, fraud protections such as cash, cryptocurrency, money orders, and
debit cards. Those living in majority White communities, by contrast, filed the
largest share of their reports about paying with credit cards, which offer more
robust fraud protection.

The research also found notable differences in the types of
problems people living in majority Black and Latino communities reported to the
FTC. There were larger shares of reports about issues with car buying, banks
and lenders, credit issues, and debt collection in those communities than in
majority White communities.

Another study in the report, which analyzed information
gleaned from several FTC cases, showed that in cases involving payday loan
applications, student debt relief programs, and specific business
opportunities, the most significant number of affected consumers resided in
predominantly Black communities.

Looking Ahead:

Per the 2021 Report, the FTC plans to continue to address the
issue through:

• Enforcement, including enhancing reporting and investigative resources to better identify conduct that targets or disproportionally impacts communities of color.

• Outreach and Education, by making resources more widely available in multiple formats and languages, seeking out additional trusted sources in communities of color, and expanding the agency’s relationships with ethnic media.

• Research, by increasing systemic review and analysis, focusing trends and disparities, conducting industry studies, and continuing to research and understand the issue

insideARM Perspective:

The FTC’s 2021 Report seems to fit right in with the CFPB’s
announcement in June 2021 that they plan to look at racial issues. In
addition to looking at historic trends and current data, both the FTC and the
CFPB will enhance their processes to obtain information, allowing them to
better dissect and understand the ongoing issues surrounding race.

ARM industry participants should take note of these reports
and the goals of both the FTC and CFPB. While there are no laws, rules, or regulations in
place requiring ARM industry participants to gather data and information
relative to disparate impacts, it’s certainly worth noting that this issue is
on the radar of the regulatory bodies charged with protecting consumers.