Archives for October 2021

New CFPB Dir. Rohit Chopra Provides Candid and In-Depth Testimony to Congress

Yesterday, the newly confirmed Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Rohit Chopra, appeared before the House Financial Services Committee for the required semi-annual report to Congress. It was a more substantive discussion than we’ve seen recently. I’ve boiled down the 4+ hour testimony into a 37-minute “greateast hits” of exchanges with members of Congress that I thought would be of interest to the industry.

You can read Director Chopra’s prepared remarks here.

You can watch the complete testimony here.

You can watch my greatest hits video here or below.




Here is a summary of the highlights I chose for the video:


Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) began by questioning Chopra about how he intends to interpret and enforce the “abusive” standard and asked why he repealed former Director Kraninger’s policy statement on this topic.

Chopra shared that “I have huge, huge aspirations to provide durable jurisprudence with respect to [an analytical framework defining abusive]” but that Kraninger’s policy did not provide such a framework. He suggested this could be developed through a combination of judicial activity interpreting the statute and CFPB rules and guidance.

McHenry also raised questions about Chopra’s intentions regarding:

  • Adhering to the Administrative Procedures Act (Chopra said “yes, always”)

  • Cooperating with the Federal Reserve’s Inspector General’s investigations (Chopra said “all of them”)

  • His opinion of Congressional oversight (Chopra said, in a nutshell, that he intended to be responsive and, as McHenry summarized, “better than the FTC”)

  • In Seila v. CFPB the court ruled that the CFPB is part of the Executive Branch; is it his intention to comply with executive orders? For instance, Clinton’s 1993 Order 12866  provides that significant regulatory actions be submitted for review to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Do you intend to adhere to that? (Chopra said as he understands it that’s not part of the process but that he would adhere to statutory requirements under rulemaking)

Rep. Anne Wagner (R-MO) said the Obama administration put in place many regulations making it difficult for families to get credit and shunned due process for businesses, and that the CFPB’s structure and funding mechanism must be reformed. She asked whether all rulemaking should be done in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act, with the public having the chance to comment. Chopra said yes. 

Rep. Wagner asked whether the CFPB should reward companies that self-identify and report concerns vs. punishing them. Chopra suggested that his record will show that where companies self-report and remediate, matters can typically be handled without public action.

[article_ad]


She suggested that regulation by enforcement creates uncertainty in markets and makes it difficult, in turn, for consumers to access products, and asked Chopra whether he would commit to clearly communicating enforcement expectations to supervised entities. Chopra said, “That is absolutely my aspiration. I think markets work well when rules are easy to follow and easy to enforce. And I think often bright lines and bands can be one way.” 

Rep. David Scott (D-GA) noted that the CFPB’s year-end financial report reveals that the Civil Penalty Fund currently has $576M in unallocated funds and that zero dollars have been allocated for financial literacy education. He asked about whether Director Chopra thought these should be used for financial literacy education.

Chopra said the Fund has two purposes; the first is to make consumers whole when restitution can’t be recovered from defendants. The second is for financial literacy initiatives. He suggested that there is a separate budget allocated for that but that he would review the situation.

Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) asked Director Chopra his opinion about the idea of a government-run credit reporting bureau, which has gained some support within Congress. He expressed concern that such a bureau would decrease privacy and accountability. 

In one of his more candid responses, Chopra said, “I have to be blunt with you. I have not actually given much thought to this because I don’t know how mechanically it would work…it would be an enormous undertaking. It would be a big mountain to move. I’m much more concerned in the near term…about law violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, how agencies are investigating disputes, and how new types of credit reporting agencies are adhering to the law.”

Lucas then asked Chopra to describe the economic impact if the ability for businesses to recover debts was restricted.

Chopra said that “credit reporting can play an important role in the financial ecosystem but where there are errors and inaccuracies, that can be a huge pain point for a business or a consumer to be able to move forward. So if you’re asking whether I think we should delete everyone’s credit report the answer is no.”

Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) raised the issue of a CFPB under the prior administration taking action against small a small title company that was put in the crosshairs of the CFPB to be made an example to the large companies. At worst, their activities were in a gray area. They were levied a fine that would have bankrupted them. Is it not your philosophy to “pound on the little guy to make sure the message gets sent”?

Chopra said “That is accurate. It doesn’t mean that small and mid-sized companies shouldn’t follow the law, but that the federal government should be focused on going after the biggest harms in the market rather than picking on people. At the FTC I was constantly distressed about the bullying of small businesses rather than taking the big companies to court, who are well resourced.”

He also asked about whether Chopra thought wild policy swings coming from the CFPB would be harmful to not only businesses but consumers. Chopra basically said yes, particularly for small businesses. The two agreed it would be more productive for businesses to spend fewer resources on hiring lawyers to deal with changing regulations.

Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY) was pleased to hear in Director Chopra’s opening remarks that he would like to restore relationship banking to the market, referring to Chopra’s stated desire to “cut through red tape.” He then asked whether Chopra thought businesses should know the rules of the road before experiencing enforcement action. Chopra said yes. 

He then referred back to the conversation with Rep. McHenry about Acting Director Uejio’s rescinding the “Abusive” policy issued by former Director Kraninger. What’s the difference between “abusive” and “unfair”, and “abusive” and “deceptive”. He suggested that Kraninger provided clarity between the terms and that rescinding the policy created confusion. Chopra disagreed and said the statement was not binding on state attorneys general. He said that “when we don’t plead those, courts can not analyze that.” 

Moving on, Rep. Barr asked Chopra whether he was open to guardrails on issuing Civil Investigative Demands (CID) to make them less of a fishing expedition. 

Time ran out and the two agreed to work together on these matters.


New CFPB Dir. Rohit Chopra Provides Candid and In-Depth Testimony to Congress
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047796-new-cfpb-dir-rohit-chopra-provides-candid/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

National Immigrants Day: Two Immigration Stories From the ARM Industry

October 28,
2021 is National Immigrants day. Immigrants make an impact in the ARM industry every
day. Here are two of their stories:

Aylix
Jenson- Attorney, Moss and Barnett

I
was born in Cape Town, South Africa. My
great-grandparents emigrated from Germany, Poland and Lithuania to South Africa
and avoided the Nazi persecution. Having decided to leave Poland, my paternal
great-grandfather went to the nearest port, intending to take the first
available ship. There were two ships in the port at the time. One ship was
going to Mexico and the other ship was going to South Africa. The ship to South
Africa left first. Two generations
later, my parents, older sister and I emigrated from South Africa to the United
States.

We
immigrated after a group claiming retaliation for United States attacks on
Afghanistan bombed a New York-style deli just a few miles from our family home
in Cape Town. As a child living in South Africa, I had enormous feelings of
uncertainty and insecurity, and I remember feeling incredibly relieved when my
parents told me we would be emigrating to the United States. 

Six
weeks after we arrived in the US, 9/11 occurred. I remember the feelings of fear and
insecurity were rekindled when I watched images repeatedly flashing on
television of planes flying into the Twin Towers, and the collapse of the
buildings. I began to wonder as a child where in the world I would ever be
safe.

Rebuilding
my sense of safety began when I started drawing with sidewalk chalk on the
driveway of my family’s home in Rochester, Minnesota, something I could not do
in South Africa due to high crime rates. My safety net expanded to learning to
ride a bicycle, another activity I was unable to do in South Africa. As my
world broadened and my freedom expanded, I realized that my initial fear of the
similarities between what I left in South Africa and what I found in the US
were unfounded. I recognized how lucky I was to be in the US and the endless
opportunities that were available to me and my family.

My
family was able to enter the US because both of my parents applied for the
Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. While only a small number of applicants from
around the world are successful, my mother was one of the lucky lottery
winners. I do not know how many applicants filed for the visa when my parents
entered the lottery, but current statistics indicate that there were 50,000
winners from a pool of more than 23.3 million applications.

In
February 2008, my family and I went through the naturalization process and
became citizens. June of this year marked my 20th year of living in the United
States and to this day, I remain just as grateful to be a citizen.


Amir Erez
– President and Owner, Cedar Financial Services

In
1987 my family immigrated to the United States. I was the middle child at 17,
my sisters were 11 and 22. My father had obtained a work permit here and was
employed as a mechanic experienced at repairing industrial sewing machines,
while my mother worked as a seamstress. Neither of my parents spoke English, yet still made the bold decision to
move our family to the United States. Our first home here was a two-bedroom apartment in “not the best
neighborhood” of Los Angeles. It was so small for our family that I slept on
the floor. 

Shortly after we arrived in the
United States, debt collection notices directed to my aunt were being sent to
our home. My aunt, however, did not live
with us. Because my parents did not speak English they asked me to review the
collection notices. I called the collection agency that sent them and explained
that my aunt did not reside there. I
thought that my call would be well-received, but instead a very aggressive
collector at the agency stated that opening my aunt’s mail was a federal crime
and that he would report me to “the authorities”. He immediately hung up on
me. Because my citizenship application
was pending at this time, I was terrified and angry thinking I had just
jeopardized my opportunity to become a U.S. citizen by trying to do the right
thing.

After college, I decided to open my
own collection agency, Cedar Financial. I vowed that I would never allow the
use of false threats or abuse to collect money at my agency. My agency would put people first. In the early
days of Cedar Financial, I would travel up and down Pico Boulevard in Los
Angeles, knocking on doors of merchants and offering to collect their bad
checks. Eventually, we were retained by
several major corporations to provide nationwide collection services. 

Today
Cedar Financial is one of the largest collection agencies in the nation,
celebrating 30 years of successful representation for creditors across the
globe.
 We are incredibly proud of our
track record of empowering immigrants and first-generation Americans, both as
clients and co-workers.
 Cedar Financial
understands first-hand the depth of hard work and responsibility necessary for
success as a first-generation citizen of the United States, and we welcome
those individuals who have successfully made the legal immigration journey as
clients, friends, and co-workers.
    

National Immigrants Day: Two Immigration Stories From the ARM Industry
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047795-national-immigrants-day-two-immigration-s/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Mark Barnhart Receives Lifetime Achievement in Business Excellence Award

CLAYSBURG, Pa. — NPC, Inc., (NPC) Owner and Chairman of the Board, Mark Barnhart, was recently presented with the Lifetime Achievement Award in Business Excellence by the Blair County Chamber of Commerce. This honor recognizes an individual who has been regarded as a business leader in Blair County for at least twenty-five years and who has positively impacted the local business community. Mark Barnhart

As the 19th recipient of the award, Barnhart was selected by a committee comprised of members of the Chamber’s executive committee, staff, and past award recipients. Barnhart’s family, colleagues, and business partners gathered to pay tribute on October 18, 2021, during the Chamber’s annual Business Excellence dinner at The Casino at Lakemont.

Chip Gallaher, NPC Chief Executive Officer, said, “Managers do things right; leaders do the right thing. That’s Mark. Mark rarely manages, but he leads 24 by 7 and 365 days out of the year.”

As a second-generation owner of NPC, Barnhart has been the visionary behind the company’s continued growth since purchasing the business from his parents in 1987. Under his leadership and guidance, NPC has transformed from a traditional printing company into a full-service print, mail, and related communications. The company currently employs nearly 500 individuals in Blair County and surrounding communities.

[article_ad]

New Pig Corporation Chairman and Co-Founder Ben Stapelfeld explained, “To Mark Barnhart, running a business is just a medium used to build experiences for others. Although his business successes have been significant, and there are many, they pale in comparison to the adventures and opportunities he has created for other people.”

A visible leader in the local community, Barnhart dedicates much of his time to mentoring and advising young entrepreneurs and start-up companies. He is also a supporter of the Blair County Chamber of Commerce. Additionally, Barnhart contributes charitably to local organizations, including food banks, libraries, YMCAs, educational foundations, and efforts that benefit law enforcement and military veterans.

“I’ve never been comfortable with the use of the word ‘I,’” said Barnhart. He explained, “It will always be a ‘we thing’ to me. Any of our success is tied to the quality of our people and the sum of their commitment, hard work, an abundance of favorable circumstances. I can’t thank the Chamber enough for providing me the opportunity and platform to tell you about NPC and share this honor with the many people who have been a part of our story.”

Today, Barnhart has transitioned into an oversight role as chairman of the board. His focus on customer and market expansion, recruitment, and the development of the company’s current and future leadership team will continue to position NPC for long-term success.

About NPC, Inc.

Privately owned and operated for over six decades, NPC, Inc. is a leader in delivering integrated solutions for the print and mail industry. By combining innovative processes, secure workflows, and operational expertise, NPC offers simplified solutions to the management and dissemination of business-critical communications programs for government and commercial sectors. Learn more at www.npcweb.com.

Mark Barnhart Receives Lifetime Achievement in Business Excellence Award
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047797-mark-barnhart-receives-lifetime-achieveme/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Maryland High Court Rules Debtors’ Attempts to Void Judgments for Unlicensed Debt Collection Subject to 3-Year SOL

The Maryland Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, recently held that judgments obtained by an unlicensed debt buyer were not void, and that the debtors’ claims for unjust enrichment and money damages under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) and the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act (MCDCA) were subject to Maryland’s general three-year statute of limitations.

The Court also held that:

  • Maryland’s class action tolling doctrine applied only to subsequent individual claims, but not to successive putative class actions; and
  • Putative class members should be permitted to file their individual claims without regard to whether the prior putative class action was pending in Maryland state court, federal court, or another jurisdiction.

Thus, the Court held, one of the debtors’ claims were timely brought due to cross-jurisdictional tolling of the statute of limitations. 

[article_ad]

A copy of the opinion in Cain v. Midland Funding, LLC is available at:  Link to Opinion.

The case arose out of two separate putative class action cases (“Action 1” and “Action 2”) brought against a consumer debt buyer by consumer debtors. In both cases, the debtors alleged that debt buyer obtained judgements against them during a time period when the debt buyer did not have a license under the Maryland Collection Agency Licensing Act.

The cases both sought declarations that the judgments obtained by the debt buyer were void, injunctive relief to prevent the debt buyer from collecting on judgments in the future and money damages arising from claims for unjust enrichment and violations of the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act.

In Action 1, the trial court granted summary judgment to each party in part, and granted a separate declaratory judgment declaring the rights of the parties. In the second action, the trial court granted the debt buyer’s motion to dismiss against the debtor. Both debtors appealed.

Aside from a procedural issue unique to Action 1, the Court of Special Appeals resolved both claims in the same manner. The Court of Special Appeals held that the debtors’ declaratory judgment counts were resolved by the Court’s recent decision in LVNV Funding LLC v. Finch, 463 Md. 586 (2019) (“Finch III”), and thus, the judgments obtained when the debt buyer was not licensed were not void.

The Court of Special Appeals further held that because the judgments had been satisfied, the debtors were not entitled to injunctive relief as the debt buyer was no longer collecting on them.

Finally, the Court of Special Appeals held that debtors’ claims for unjust enrichment and money damages for statutory claims were barred by the general three-year statute of limitations codified at Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 5-101.

The debtors both filed petitions for writ of certiorari which the Court of Appeals granted.

As to the question of whether the judgment was void, the Maryland Court of Appeals agreed with the intermediate appellate court that the recent ruling in Finch III, which held that a judgment in favor of an unlicensed agency was not void, resolved the issue. As the debtors did not seek review of the decision regarding injunctive relief, the Court focused its attention on determining whether or not the debtors’ claims were time barred.

In determining when accrual of a statute of limitations occurs, Maryland applies the discovery rule — i.e., a claim accrues when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the wrong.  Poffenberger v. Risser, 290 Md. 631, 636 (1981). The Court upheld the lower court’s determination that the accrual of the action began when the debtors made their first payments on their judgments. As such, absent a showing that (1) a different statute applied, (2) the time wasn’t extended under a continuing harm theory or (3) the time was tolled, the actions were barred.

The Court agreed with the intermediate appellate court that the applicable statute of limitations was the general three-year statute of limitations and not the 12-year statute of limitations applicable to specialties claims as the debtors argued.

The Court of Appeals found the debtors’ argument that they were subject to CJ § 5-102(a)(3) which provides for a 12-year statute of limitations for “actions on a judgment,” unpersuasive. After ascertaining the purpose and intent of the General Assembly in enacting the statute, a review of case law and the other specialties actions listed in the statute, the Court determined that “actions on a judgment” referred to actions enforcing a judgment not any action that involves the entry of a judgment as debtors argued.

The debtors also argued that the continuing harm doctrine applied, because they made payments to the debt buyer over a period of time. The Court again rejected the debtors’ argument, as the wrongful conduct at issue was the unlicensed status of the debt buyer when it filed the collection actions and obtained judgments against the debtors, and the collection activities that the debtors sought to extend their accrual date for limitations purposes occurred after the debt buyer became licensed.

The debtor in the Action 1 also argued that the statute of limitations should have been tolled because he was a putative member of a class action prior to the filing of Action 1.  However, the Court declined to expand the American Pipe class action tolling doctrine to extend to include successive class actions rather than just individual claims. The Court found tolling of successive class action suits to be inconsistent with the notions of judicial economy and efficiency that form the basis of the Maryland Rule 2-231 class certification process.

However, the Court did extend the doctrine to include cross-jurisdictional tolling, reasoning that once the trial court has decided that a putative class action cannot proceed as a class (including by dismissal, denial of class certification, or forum non conveniens), the putative class members should be permitted to file their individual claims without regard to whether the class action was pending in Maryland state court, federal court, or another jurisdiction.

After making these determinations, the Court found that the debtor in the Action 1’s individual claims were timely filed as the statute of limitations was tolled via cross-jurisdictional tolling and that the debtor from the Action 2’s claims were time barred as no applicable tolling applied to her claims.

Finally, the debtor from Action 1 argued that the intermediate appellate court did not have jurisdiction to review the trial court’s ruling because the trial court’s ruling and declaratory judgment did not constitute a final judgment. However, the Court of Appeals found that the trial court had rendered a final judgment in disposing of the debt buyer’s motion to dismiss and granting the debtors’ motion for summary judgment.

Thus, the Maryland Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court of Special Appeals, except as to time barring of the debtors’ claims in the first action, as the Court found the statute of limitations was cross-jurisdictionally tolled as to those claims.


Maryland High Court Rules Debtors’ Attempts to Void Judgments for Unlicensed Debt Collection Subject to 3-Year SOL
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047791-maryland-high-court-rules-debtors-attempt/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

LTD Financial Services, L.P. Achieves Successful Completion of SOC 2 Type 2 Examination

HOUSTON, TX – – LTD Financial Services, L.P. (LTD), a full service accounts receivable management and business process outsourcing company, announced today the successful completion of their SOC 2 Type 2 Examination, confirming industry leading standards of information security are in place.  

 

“Data security is a top priority for our clients,” said David John, CEO. “To support our aggressive growth strategy for full account management services and data security, this achievement assures clients that LTD has implemented effective safeguards to protect our clients’ data.”

 

LTD retained Bronsky & Company CPAs as the service auditor to perform LTD’s SOC 2 Type 2 audit work, with preparation and facilitation assistance from the Hampton Pryor Group. Upon completion of the audit, LTD received a non-qualified (NQ) examination report from Bronsky & Company. The NQ report states that in the auditor’s opinion, all controls identified are working as designed. LTD’s SOC 2 Type 2 examination reinforces the company’s commitment to protect the confidentiality and integrity of customer data and strengthens our robust information security evaluation processes, which also include SOC 1 Type 2 examination and PCI Security validation process (currently in process).

 

About LTD Financial Services, L.P.

Established in 1993, LTD Financial Services, L.P. is a nationally recognized provider of ARM and BPO services. LTD’s solutions consistently deliver quality customer experiences and superior financial results for our clients through leading technology, omni-channel communications, and data driven decisions in a fully compliant, customer-centric culture. Our approach places our clients first in every aspect of our relationship including Customer Solutions, Care, Collections, Recovery, Compliance, Controls, Communication, and Accountability.

About Bronsky and Company CPAs


Bronsky & Company full-service accounting and business consulting CPA firm located in Western New York. We offer our clients all the resources and services of a large accounting firm while maintaining a commitment to smaller firm price and service. In addition to traditional accounting services, we also specialize in providing general business consulting, SOC examinations for the ARM industry, turnaround management assistance, forensic accounting, transaction due diligence, outsourced CFO/Controller assistance, and asset based lending due diligence services. Our attention to detail, our emphasis on communicating with clients, and our ability to think like business owners instead of traditional accountants has allowed us to remain competitive within our suite of services.

About The Hampton Pryor Group


Since its founding in 2001, The Hampton Pryor Group has been a leading provider of advisory and consultant services to mortgage servicers, credit grantors, debt purchasers and collections agencies. Our company partners with yours to improve your operations and compliance while containing risk. This is accomplished using a suite of strategic and tactical offerings which address the key components of mortgage servicing, compliance, collections and recovery management. With over 125 years of senior, executive and “C” level management experience across the full spectrum of mortgage servicing and accounts receivables management verticals, we have a proven track record of delivering on our commitments to our clients, both domestically and internationally.


LTD Financial Services, L.P. Achieves Successful Completion of SOC 2 Type 2 Examination
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047793-ltd-financial-services-lp-achieves-succes/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

CFPB Orders Six Large Technology Platforms Offering Payment Services to Provide Information

CFPB Director Rohit Chopra has wasted no time
in acting on comments he made at his confirmation hearing regarding the risks
posed by the collection of data by large platforms.  In just his first
full week as CFPB Director, the CFPB sent orders to six technology platforms offering payment
services
 directing them to provide information to the
Bureau.  The orders were issued as market monitoring orders under the
Dodd-Frank Act, which directs the Bureau to monitor for risks to consumers in
the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services and
authorizes the Bureau to require covered persons and service providers to
provide information needed to perform such monitoring.

In his statement about the orders, Director
Chopra raised numerous concerns about Big Tech companies’ use of the data
collected on their payments platforms.  He indicated that the CFPB’s
inquiry “will help to inform regulators and policymakers about the future of
our payments system” and “will also yield insights that may help the CFPB to
implement other statutory responsibilities, including any potential rulemaking
under Section 1033 of [Dodd-Frank].”  (Section 1033 requires consumer
financial services providers to give consumers access to certain financial
information and is the subject of an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued
by the Bureau in October 2020.)

The orders require responses by December 15,
2021.  However, in light of the breadth of the information requested, it
would not be surprising for the recipients of the orders to seek additional
time to respond.  The orders request detailed information about the
following:

  • The information sought relates to specific payment “products” offered by the “company.”  The orders’ definition of “company” includes any parent companies, wholly or partially owned subsidiaries, unincorporated divisions, joint ventures, operations under assumed names, and affiliates.  The definition of a “product” is any “C2C and/or C2B payments product or services the company offers or provides to consumers, as well as any product or service the company offers or provides to consumers in connection with facilitation of C2C and/or C2B payments, including funds-loading or other fund-receiving transactions made primarily for personal, family, or household purposes that are not C2C or C2B transactions.  “C2B” means consumer to business payments made primarily for personal, family, or household purposes so long as the transaction involves a U.S.-based consumer (but business parties do not need to be in the U.S. for a transaction to be covered and transactions in or enabled by cryptocurrency are included.)  “C2C” means both domestic U.S. payments made by one consumer to another consumer and payments from consumers in the U.S. to consumers outside the U.S. that are made primarily for personal, family, or household purposes (and includes transactions in or enabled by cryptocurrency.)
  • Data harvesting.  The information sought relates to “Direct Product Data” and “Indirect Product Data” and the kinds of data that the company generates from this data.  “Direct Product Data” means data that the company has collected (and maintained) as a result of consumer’s use of a product.  “Indirect Product Data” is data that is both (1) generated, at least in part from Direct Product Data, and (2) about individual consumer users or commercial users of a product.  (A commercial user is the non-consumer party that accepts payments from consumers or otherwise makes use of a product to engage in financial transactions with consumers.)
  • Data use and monetization.  The information sought relates to how the company monetizes Direct and Indirect Product Data, including by improving service delivery to product customers, selling the data, and selling advertising or other targeted content based on attributes derived from the data.
  • Access restrictions.  The information sought relates to the company’s policies for managing access to products for consumers and commercial entities, whether, and if so how, the company encourages or requires users of other company products or services to use a “product,” and how the company manages third-party involvement in product delivery.
  • Consumer Protections.  The information sought relates to how the company addresses various aspects of consumer protection, including disclosures and other protections with respect to data practices about a product, detection of fraudulent activity, methods for consumer users to address issues and problems concerning a product, and any accompanying compliance obligations under federal consumer financial laws and applicable Bureau regulations.
  • Usage data/metrics.  Product-use metrics and related information is sought, including metrics on complaint-handling.
  • Organizational structure.  Information is sought about the company’s organizational structure as it relates to products.

The Bureau’s issuance of the orders was
praised by the Consumer Bankers Association.  In its statement about the orders, CBA
applauded the Bureau “for advancing the Bureau’s mission of protecting
consumers in the rapidly evolving financial marketplace,” observing that
“[s]ince the Bureau was founded, a growing share of banking activity has
occurred outside of the purview of leading regulators, putting consumers and
the resiliency of the financial system at risk.”   CBA reiterated its
long-standing support for “ a level playing field to ensure every American
family receives the protections they deserve, regardless of where they go to
meet their financial needs.”

CFPB Orders Six Large Technology Platforms Offering Payment Services to Provide Information
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047786-cfpb-orders-six-large-technology-platform/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

CFPB Releases Spanish Model Validation Notice

On October 18, 2021, the CFPB released a Spanish translation
of the Model Validation Notice found in Regulation F (“Reg F”). Per the CFPB,
this translation is a “complete and accurate Spanish translation of the Model
Validation Notice found in Appendix B of Reg F.

A debt collector who uses this notice, and has also provided
the consumer with the model English-language version, will be covered by the safe
harbor protections afforded by Reg F (See Comment 1006.34(e) – 1). The
translated version includes the same optional disclosures seen in the English
language version, except for the Spanish-language disclosure, which appears on the
English-language version and advises the consumer of their right to receive a Spanish
translated version.

The translated version
of the model validation notice can be found here.

CFPB Releases Spanish Model Validation Notice
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047780-cfpb-releases-spanish-model-validation-no/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Women in Consumer Finance Conference Announces Scholarship Program

ROCKVILLE, Md. — Women in Consumer Finance (WCF) and the iA Institute are proud to announce the launch of the 2021 Women in Consumer Finance Scholarship Program. Two applicants will receive a free pass to attend Women in Consumer Finance in person on December 6-8 in Scottsdale, AZ, thanks to our generous sponsor, Financial Recovery Services.

“The past 18 months have been difficult in so many ways for so many people, across all industries and communities. So, we’d like to do what we can to provide the WCF experience to those who need it most,” said Women in Consumer Finance chair Stephanie Eidelman. 

If you are currently seeking employment, if you don’t have institutional support to attend WCF, or if you want to nominate a worthy candidate, apply today (or send this on to someone you think should apply!)

The connections and lessons gained will last well beyond the 3 days, transforming your career in ways you didn’t even know were possible. This simple application could lead to hundreds of new opportunities. 

Recipients will get the opportunity to grow professionally, expand their network, and build practical leadership skills through sessions such as, “Getting Women to the Table,” “Communicating with Confidence,” and “The Mechanics of Building Your Network.”. You can view the full conference agenda here. 

Don’t feel like you’re eligible for a free pass? Register for an in person or virtual ticket here so you can be part of the fastest growing, female-only, consumer finance community. It’s your chance to put your career first and take ownership of your own development, both personally and professionally. 

About Women in Consumer Finance

WCF is a truly special event. It’s not at all about consumer finance, but about lifting women up without putting men down. The conference is designed to help women at all career levels to actively build their group of “people,” to build confidence and communication skills and to overcome shared challenges. The connection is that we do all of this in the context of our common industry, so the relationships built are most likely to be directly useful. 

Women in Consumer Finance is a community of women dedicated to building others up and sharing experiences that impact us all. The connections and bonds that are created at WCF are unique and hard to come by in day-to-day working scenarios. 

No matter where you are in your career, whether you’re just starting out, or managing large teams and projects, you have something to learn and teach others. To take that next step in your career, it’s important to put yourself in new environments that push you to be the best version of yourself. Across 3 days, Women in Consumer Finance provides that safe and open environment to facilitate deep connections amongst all of our attendees. 

About The iA Institute

The iA Institute is a media company that provides news, education, events and community for professionals in consumer finance. The iA team believes the value of your time and investment in our content should be undeniable, so we thoughtfully design everything we do with a focus on the details that make a difference. Our initiatives cover three areas: Legal & Compliance, Strategy & Tech, and Women & Diversity. iA is a certified Woman-Owned Business.


Women in Consumer Finance Conference Announces Scholarship Program
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047781-women-consumer-finance-conference-announc/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

The Orion Capital Solutions Team Volunteers and Helps Clean Up The Boca Grande Beach

ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. — Orion
Capital Solutions, LLC
proudly volunteered
their time to help clean up the Boca Grande Beach in Boca Grande, Florida on
Saturday, September 21, 2021. With
Gasparilla Vacations co-hosting the Keep Lee County Beautiful event, six team members worked all day with various
volunteers to pick up trash and clean up the famous beach on the other side of
the bay from Fort Myers, Florida. 


Kristin
LoVallo, Orion Capital Solution’s Director of HR/Compliance, had this to say on the team’s involvement: “We are so
proud of our team for getting out there, volunteering their time, and
contributing to the amazing work that goes into the Lee County beach cleanup.
We work every day to ensure our clients can continue to live a healthy
financial life and we want to provide that same effort and initiative to the
community we share with our consumers. The Orion team is proud to have
cultivated an amazing culture that promotes and fosters both community
involvement and professional development.” 

 

A Monumental Effort

The Orion team headed out to Boca Grande on International
Coastal Clean-Up Day (ICC) – the 31st year of the
international effort. Every September, ICC has encouraged over nine million
people from around the world to clean up nearly 300,000 miles of coastline and
pick up over 144 million pounds of trash. 


Kristin adds: “As leaders in the receivables management industry,
we had to do our part to influence the change we wanted to both be and see in
our community. Our team is glad to help promote Keep Lee County Beautiful and
motivate both our staff and our community to not only help clean up the spaces
we live in but also continue to influence others to be better stewards of the
beaches we all love and enjoy daily.” 


Since 2017, Keep Lee County Beautiful has signed up over 17,000
volunteers, removed over 156,000 pounds of litter and debris, hosted over 750
events, and planted 32,500 plants, gardens and trees. 

 

A Culture Of Change

The company’s mission is to provide trusted debt collection
services to creditors while offering consumers accessible and achievable
payment options leading towards a safe and secure financial future; the Orion
team could not achieve those goals while ignoring the communities they share
with consumers. 


Orion Capital Solutions is proud to support not only Keep Lee
County Beautiful, but also work closely with organizations like
Southtowns YMCA, the Boys and Girls Club of Orchard Park, the Baker Victory Services,
St. Jude’s Hospital, and the Ronald McDonald
House. Their approach of balancing smart, integrated
technology while remaining courteous and compassionate with consumers is
fostered through these organizations and their amazing staff’s daily efforts to
improve the lives around them.

 

About Orion Capital Solutions, LLC

Orion
Capital Solutions, LLC is a professional, nationally
licensed collection agency headquartered in Orchard Park, New York. Founded in
2018, they provide outstanding services to clients and consumers through the
integration of technology and an experienced and compassionate team. The team
has over 30 years of experience in delivering exceptional results for creditors
and realistic solutions for consumers.

The Orion Capital Solutions Team Volunteers and Helps Clean Up The Boca Grande Beach
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047782-orion-capital-solutions-team-volunteers-a/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

FTC Reports on Fighting Fraud in Minority Communities

On October 15, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced
that it had issued a report
outlining the impact of fraud on communities of Color (2021 Report). The report
follows a 2016
report to Congress
(2016 Report) titled “Combating Fraud in
African-American and Latino Communities: The FTC’s Comprehensive Strategic
Plan.”  The 2021 Report provides an
update on the FTC’s efforts since the 2016 Report, include a broad view of the
types of issues under the FTC’s jurisdiction, and concludes with a road map for
moving forward.

In addition to providing research regarding communities of
color and a looking forward plan, the 2021 Report focuses on the following three
issues:

  • FTC enforcement actions. Per the FTC, “Aggressive law enforcement is a key component of the FTC’s efforts to protect communities of color.”  This section of the 2021 Report includes details of more than 25 enforcement actions brought by the FTC in the last five years where the unlawful conduct either targeted or disproportionately affected communities of color, broken down into the following segments:

o  
Automobile Buying Issues

o  
Student Loan Debt Relief

o  
Marketing Prepaid Cards

o  
Government Impersonators

o  
Marketing for Inmate Services

o  
Deceptive and Unsubstantiated Advertising Claims

o  
Jobs and Money-Making Opportunities

o  
Credit, Background Checks, and Access to Housing

o  
Payday Loans and Debt Collection  

  • Outreach and Education Initiatives to communities of color
  • FTC Workshops and Industry Studies

[article_ad]

Findings

The 2021 Report found several critical differences in the way
that fraud and other consumer problems affect communities of color. For
example, it found that when people reported losing money, those living in
majority Black and Latino communities more often reported paying in ways with
few, if any, fraud protections such as cash, cryptocurrency, money orders, and
debit cards. Those living in majority White communities, by contrast, filed the
largest share of their reports about paying with credit cards, which offer more
robust fraud protection.

The research also found notable differences in the types of
problems people living in majority Black and Latino communities reported to the
FTC. There were larger shares of reports about issues with car buying, banks
and lenders, credit issues, and debt collection in those communities than in
majority White communities.

Another study in the report, which analyzed information
gleaned from several FTC cases, showed that in cases involving payday loan
applications, student debt relief programs, and specific business
opportunities, the most significant number of affected consumers resided in
predominantly Black communities.

Looking Ahead:

Per the 2021 Report, the FTC plans to continue to address the
issue through:

  • Enforcement, including enhancing reporting and investigative resources to better identify conduct that targets or disproportionally impacts communities of color.
  • Outreach and Education, by making resources more widely available in multiple formats and languages, seeking out additional trusted sources in communities of color, and expanding the agency’s relationships with ethnic media.
  • Research, by increasing systemic review and analysis, focusing trends and disparities, conducting industry studies, and continuing to research and understand the issue

insideARM Perspective:

The FTC’s 2021 Report seems to fit right in with the CFPB’s
announcement in June 2021
that they plan to look at racial issues. In
addition to looking at historic trends and current data, both the FTC and the
CFPB will enhance their processes to obtain information, allowing them to
better dissect and understand the ongoing issues surrounding race.

ARM industry participants should take note of these reports
and the goals of both the FTC and CFPB. While there are no laws, rules, or regulations in
place requiring ARM industry participants to gather data and information
relative to disparate impacts, it’s certainly worth noting that this issue is
on the radar of the regulatory bodies charged with protecting consumers.

 

FTC Reports on Fighting Fraud in Minority Communities
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00047773-ftc-reports-fighting-fraud-minority-commu/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance