Archives for June 2014

YGC Joins Vertican


Vertican Technologies, Inc. of Montville, NJ (VTI) and Automated Collection Control, Inc. d/b/a YGC Solutions of Pine Brook, NJ (YGC) are both pleased to announce that their Boards of Directors have approved a definitive agreement for YGC to merge with Vertican, effective June 1, 2014. The agreement, endorsed by unanimous shareholder consent on both sides, is a friendly, stock-for-stock transaction in which Vertican has acquired 100 percent of YGC shares in exchange for shares of Vertican.

The transaction will provide the collection industry with best-in-class technology that will help make their operations more efficient, compliant, and profitable.

“In addition to creating a world-class company, this is a compelling strategic transaction that will leverage our commitment to excellence and continuous improvement for the collection industry through insight-driven innovation,” said Stevan H. Goldman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vertican Technologies, Inc. “The addition of YGC and its innovative YouveGotClaims technology to Vertican creates an exciting opportunity for our customers, our company and for our talented and dedicated team members.”

Jeffrey Zuck, publisher of The National List of Attorneys and co-founder of YGC added “Vertican’s commitment to excellence in customer service is perfectly aligned with our philosophy at YGC.  Not only did this add impetus to the merger, it also ensures uninterrupted dedication to our customer’s success.  For all concerned, this is a great next step for YGC.”

According to Isaac Goldman, Chief Operating Officer at Vertican Technologies, “This combination creates a company that will synergize the YouveGotClaims technology with the case management software from CLS and Q-Soft. The opportunity to bring all of these exceptional teams together will result in tighter cross-platform integration for all of our customers, while improving reliability and transparency throughout the entire collection industry.”  Isaac has previously served as Chief Operating Officer at both CLS and YGC.

“We expect an accelerated deployment of existing and new innovative products and services for our customers, said Kurt Sund, founder of Q-Soft and now the Chief Technology Officer of Vertican, adding “This merger delivers enormous opportunities for our current and future customers.  The closer working relationship with YGC’s customers positions Vertican closer to the entire collection cycle, from issuers, to buyers, to servicers. The resulting development benefits will be immediate and significant.”

Vertican will begin releasing new products immediately, beginning with Vertiply, its new comprehensive compliance tracking and reporting software.  Full support and ongoing software enhancements will continue, uninterrupted, on all existing products from all four Vertican-owned companies, Q-Soft, CLS, YGC and Fillimerica.

For more information, contact Vertican Technologies at www.vertican.com, info@vertican.com, or (800) 435-7257.

YGC Joins Vertican
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/collection-technologies/collection-technology/ygc-joins-vertican/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Ontario Systems CEO Ron Fauquher honored by David Sursa Leadership Award


Ontario Systems, a leading receivables management technology and services provider, announced CEO Ron Fauquher has received The Community Foundation of Muncie & Delaware County’s David Sursa Leadership Award today, in recognition of extraordinary leadership by a non-profit board member. A local executive and philanthropist, David Sursa is memorialized by the award paying tribute to the characteristics and commitments to the community its namesake engendered during his lifetime.

“The Community Foundation is pleased to recognize Ron Fauquher with the David Sursa Leadership Award,” comments Kelly Shrock, President of the Community Foundation of Muncie & Delaware County.  “Ron has demonstrated his commitment to our community in numerous ways through his volunteer service with many organizations.  For this and many other reasons, the committee selected him for this honor.”

Fauquher’s work as a board member with Ivy Tech inspired his nomination, which rewards and encourages professionals who live or work in Delaware County, and offer services that benefit Delaware County. Ivy Tech was granted $1,000 as part of the award.

“It is a special honor to receive a leadership award named in honor of Dave Sursa,” Fauquher says. “I was one of the fortunate many who got to know David, for what he stood, and how much he believed that volunteerism and leadership were the keys to making our community great. He showed us that men and women in business had a special responsibility to give back to the communities in which they lived and worked. To have that award benefit the wonderful Ivy Tech organization, and their mission to improve lives through affordable higher education, makes it doubly special to me.”

Ontario Systems, LLC is a leading provider of accounts receivable and strategic receivables management solutions for the collections and healthcare industries. Offering a full portfolio of software, services, and business process expertise, Ontario Systems customers include nine of the 10 largest collections agencies, and three of the five biggest health systems in the U.S., with 55,000 representatives in more than 500 locations. To learn more about how Ontario Systems can help power up your receivables, visit OntarioSystems.com, or email info@ontariosystems.com.

Ontario Systems CEO Ron Fauquher honored by David Sursa Leadership Award
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/collection-technologies/collection-technology/ontario-systems-ceo-ron-fauquher-honored-by-david-sursa-leadership-award/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Executive Changes: Centurion IV Names New CEO and Director of Client Services


Centurion IV is happy to announce the addition of Jerry Smith as CEO and Staci Kurz as Director of Client Services.

Jerry brings with him 23 years of collection experience and knowledge of a multitude of portfolio types. His enthusiasm and creativity will work greatly with the talented team of Centurion IV.

Staci’s knowledge client demands and her ability to deal with a wide range of topics in the collection industry will prove to be invaluable to Centurion IV as its explosive growth continues.

Centurion IV provides high level Receivables Management services for a broad spectrum of clientele, principally in the recovery of outstanding accounts receivables, representing both major and local institutions alike.

Executive Changes: Centurion IV Names New CEO and Director of Client Services
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/executive-changes-centurion-iv-names-new-ceo-and-director-of-client-services/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Reporting Rental Payments Could Benefit Subprime Consumers in Just One Month


A new TransUnion analysis found that the reporting of rental payment information to the credit bureaus in a manner similar to other financial obligations could have a positive effect for the majority of subprime consumers’ credit.

The subprime segment of the population, those consumers who may be viewed as higher credit risks, could experience positive effects with only one month of on-time rental payment information. The findings were unveiled at the National Apartment Association’s Education Conference & Exposition in Denver.

The analysis found that approximately eight in 10 subprime consumers (79.1% of those with a VantageScore® 2.0 credit score lower than 641 on a scale from 501 to 990) experienced an increase in their score one month into their new apartment lease. Nearly 41% of subprime consumers saw their VantageScore increase by 10 points or more after one month.

“Following the mortgage crisis during the last recession, home ownership rates have declined to 20-year lows as many consumers choose to rent. In fact, there are now 40 million American renter households in 2013, which is up nearly 5 million since 2007,” said Tim Martin, executive vice president at TransUnion. “Despite millions of more renters, most rental payment histories are not provided to credit bureaus, and renters looking to improve their credit standing cannot do so.  To that end, TransUnion is introducing ResidentCredit, a newly-expanded service that encourages property managers to report the payment performance of their apartment residents.”

The TransUnion ResidentCredit service is a relatively simple process. Property managers will submit data about their residents to TransUnion each month, reporting the amount and timeliness of their last payment, and any balance owed. This rental payment information will appear on their consumer files alongside their other financial obligations such as auto loans, credit cards, and student loans.

TransUnion’s research also compared the credit score impact of being a first-time homebuyer (where the mortgage payment is reported to the credit bureaus) versus being a renter (where the apartment rental payment is not reported). The research found that, on average, those who became first-time home buyers in early 2012 experienced a 5.2% increase in their credit score over the next year.  However, the average renter actually saw a slight decline (-0.4%) in credit score during this same timeframe.

In addition to the potential positive impact already described for subprime renters, TransUnion’s analysis found that the majority of the overall renter population could also benefit from having their rental payments reported via ResidentCredit. Nearly seven in 10 renters (66.7%) in the analysis experienced positive or neutral VantageScore credit score changes after just one month. Nearly two in 10 renters (18.8%) saw a 10-point increase to their score or better in the first month.

“We believe reporting rental payment performance is simply the right thing to do for apartment residents and the apartment rental industry,” said Martin. “Renters will be able to build positive credit history, gain access to more financial products, and most importantly, help them recover from the housing market crash. At the same time, property managers will have more certainty about residents’ payment history and will get to recognize on-time payments, which should help improve future payment performance and lower the need for costly evictions.”

To support this positive industry-wide initiative, TransUnion will charge no fees to report rental payment information via ResidentCredit.  In addition, TransUnion ResidentCredit is credit bureau agnostic. If the property manager who furnishes the data requests it, TransUnion will share the information reported with other national credit reporting companies to be included in their consumer credit files and scores.

As a global leader in credit and information management, TransUnion creates advantages for millions of people around the world by gathering, analyzing and delivering information. For businesses, TransUnion helps improve efficiency, manage risk, reduce costs and increase revenue by delivering comprehensive data and advanced analytics and decisioning. For consumers, TransUnion provides the tools, resources and education to help manage their credit health and achieve their financial goals. Through these and other efforts, TransUnion is working to build stronger economies worldwide. Founded in 1968 and headquartered in Chicago, TransUnion reaches businesses and consumers in 33 countries around the world on five continents.  www.transunion.com/business

Reporting Rental Payments Could Benefit Subprime Consumers in Just One Month
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/collection-laws-regulations/collection-laws-and-regulations/reporting-rental-payments-could-benefit-subprime-consumers-in-just-one-month/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Dials, Contacts, and the Difference: Collection Calls to Consumers


The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act can be frustrating around the topic of collection calls. It’s very clear on what constitutes “harassment or abuse,” but remains coy about how that relates to attempts, dials, and contacts.

15 U.S. Code § 1692d – Harassment or abuse

A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

(5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

So, let’s break some terms down:

Dials: These are attempts at contacts. You have caused the consumer’s phone to ring or it is apparent, per caller ID, that you have made an attempt. A dial may lead to a contact, but in and of itself, is not considered one. As Rossman suggests, “I always start a conversation on call volume at three dials or attempts a day.”

Contacts: If someone answers one of your dials, or if you leave a voicemail message – the collector or a pre-recorded message – that is a contact.

Much has changed the technological landscape from the early days of the FDCPA to today. In 1978, we didn’t have cell phones or caller ID. The consumer could either sit there and listen to the ring on the phone and not answer it, or he might be compelled to take it off the line and let the person hear a busy signal. Either way, consumers were aware that the call was being made at the time. “If they were out three times a day, morning, noon and night, walking their dog,” Ron Canter of The Law Offices of Ronald S. Canter, LLC, shared in a Call Volume webinar, “and if the collector called three times each day at the same time they were walking the dog, they would never have known back then that that the collector was making any calls. Now, they do.”

The best practice, compliance-wise, might be to limit yourself to three dials a day per consumer. Not per consumer line — which could lead to nine dials a day if a consumer has a home landline, a cell phone, and a work number on file. That can, in the eyes of a consumer-sympathetic judge, be a violation of d(5). We’ve put together a handy chart that suggests how dials and contacts should be handled.

DIAL –> VERBAL CONTACT: Establishing actual contact with a consumer allows the collector to either accept payment in full – in which case that is the only contact needed – or to make payment arrangements. When making payment arrangements, lines of communication need to be left open; however, if the consumer is regularly making payments on his delinquent account, then there is no need for continual phone calls. If there is an interruption in those calls, then the best practice would be to begin your contact series again – with the “three attempts per day” in mind.

Of course, a consumer can also, at this point, tell the collector that he has no intent to pay. The consumer can also tell the collector that this number is not a good number to call. Any communication from the consumer about his inability to pay should be documented thoroughly in the consumer’s file. If he has demanded not to be contacted, that number should be removed and next steps with those kinds of consumers should begin.

DIAL –> MESSAGE or VOICEMAIL: A reasonable amount of time must be built in to allow the consumer the chance to return the call. Best practice might suggest that three days to one week separate a voicemail message and continued attempts after the message.

DIAL –> NO CONTACT: Proceed with the best practice in mind of “three attempts per consumer per day.” Bear in mind the state laws of where the consumer is residing.

Additional insight into collection call compliance is available in our Research Library with two new products:

UPDATED: To the Point Collection Call Compliance: This has been updated with the above information, as well as a chart detailing one- and all-party collection call recording consent.

Operations Guide: Call VolumeOur Operations Guide offers clarity, insight, and best practices around call volume/frequency. It looks at: Special Case States, which have additional laws around call attempts; what the difference is between an Attempt and a Contact; how call recording, when allowed, can save your bacon; and a look at recent cases the involve call volume and what insight collection agencies can glean from them.

Dials, Contacts, and the Difference: Collection Calls to Consumers
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/accounts-receivables-management/dials-contacts-and-the-difference-collection-calls-to-consumers/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

GE Capital/Synchrony Bank to Pay $225 million in CFPB Credit Card Discrimination Action


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today announced that it is ordering GE Capital Retail Bank, now known as Synchrony Bank, to provide an estimated $225 million in relief to consumers harmed by illegal and discriminatory credit card practices.

The CFPB said it is the federal government’s largest credit card discrimination settlement in history.

GE Capital must refund $56 million to approximately 638,000 consumers who were subjected to deceptive marketing practices. As part of the joint enforcement action by the CFPB and Department of Justice, GE Capital must also provide an additional $169 million to about 108,000 borrowers excluded from debt relief offers because of their national origin.

“Today’s action will provide $225 million in relief to GE Capital credit card customers who were harmed by deceptive marketing or discrimination,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “We will continue to take action against marketing tactics that trick consumers into buying credit card products they do not want or cannot use. Consumers also deserve to be treated fairly no matter where they live or what language they speak.”

“The blatant discrimination that occurred here is unlawful and will not be tolerated,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels for the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. “Borrowers have the right to credit card terms that do not differ based on their national origin, and the settlement today sends the message that the Justice Department can and will vigorously enforce the law against lenders who violate that right.”

GE Capital, which changed its name to Synchrony Bank on June 2, 2014, is a federal savings bank headquartered in Draper, Utah with assets totaling more than $39 billion. GE provides store-branded credit cards that are sold to consumers by merchants and retailers across the country.

The CFPB’s enforcement action related to credit card add-on products stems from a  supervisory examination which was conducted between December 2012 and February 2013. The action related to the discriminatory credit card practices resulted from GE Capital’s self-reporting of the issue to the CFPB, which led to a joint investigation between the CFPB and the Department of Justice.

GE Capital had two different promotions that allowed credit card customers with delinquent accounts to settle their balances by paying off a specific portion of their debt.

  • Statement Credit Offer: Customers with balances greater than $700, a credit score below 670, and whose minimum payment due was more than $150 were offered a credit of between $25 to $100 if they paid off their minimum amount due. This promotion ran from March 2010 to March 2012.
  • Settlement Offer: Customers with balances greater than $200, a credit score within certain thresholds, four or more payments overdue, and no payments in the past 90 days received offers to waive their remaining account balance if they paid between 25 percent and 55 percent of what was owed. This promotion ran from January 2009 to March 2012.

The CFPB said that GE Capital did not extend these offers to any customer who indicated that they preferred to communicate in Spanish or had a mailing address in Puerto Rico, even if the customer met the promotion’s qualifications. This meant that Hispanic populations were unfairly denied the opportunity to benefit from these promotions.

CFPB examiners also identified several deceptive marketing practices used by GE Capital to promote its credit card add-on products. The bank offered five different debt cancellation add-on products: “Card Security,” “Account Security,” “Account Security Plus,” “Debt Security,” and “Debt Security Plus.”

GE promoted these products as providing debt cancellation of a certain percent of the consumer’s balance in the event of certain hardships like involuntary unemployment or disability. The Bureau found that GE Capital’s telemarketers misrepresented these products to consumers by claiming they were free of charge, were available for a limited time when they were permanent products, and failing to disclose that consumers who agreed to the products were making a purchase.

In addition to the monetary penalties, GE Capital agreed to discontinue the discriminatory and deceptive practices. The company must also forgive the debt of accounts that did not receive debt relief offers.

For the customers that did not receive debt relief offers because they preferred to communicate in Spanish or had a mailing address in Puerto Rico, if GE Capital had written off or sold their debt, that debt will be forgiven.

 

GE Capital/Synchrony Bank to Pay $225 million in CFPB Credit Card Discrimination Action
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/credit-card-accounts-receivable/credit-card-receivables/ge-capitalsynchrony-bank-to-pay-225-million-in-cfpb-credit-card-discrimination-action/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

FDCPA Case Ruling on Convenience Fees Having Impact on Collectors


The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York earlier this year denied a debt collector’s motion to dismiss an FDCPA case, holding that its $5 surcharge for payments via credit card may have violated the law.  The case has apparently been used recently against many other debt collectors.

In Quinteros v. MBI Associates, Inc., 2014 WL 793138 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2014), the debtor received a debt collection notice from the debt collection agency, which stated that the debtor would pay a $5 processing fee for optional credit card or check by phone payments.

The letter stated, in pertinent part:

Should you require more time to make payment or wish to make payment arrangements, please call this office upon receipt of this letter. Our office accepts Visa, MasterCard and American Express which you may pay over the phone or online at www.paymbi.com. There will be a $5.00 processing fee for all credit cards or checks over the phone.

The debtor then sued for a violation of the FDCPA contending that the $5 charge was not expressly authorized in the underlying debt contract.

Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

In February, the District Court judge denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, holding that (i) the collection of any amount not expressly authorized in the underlying debt contract is a violation of the FDCPA, regardless of whether the debt collector is engaged in an abusive practice; and (ii) the notice sent to the debtor that referenced the $5 processing fee violated the FDCPA’s prohibition on misleading documents because it implied that the defendant could legally receive this payment.

Although this ruling is older than most we cover, it has become more relevant in recent months. An insideARM.com reader tipped us off that this particular ruling was being used in other recent case filings. After making a few calls, we learned that this was indeed the case.

It also aligns with a recent recommendation from the North Carolina Collectors Association that urged collection agencies in that state to stop charging payment convenience fees while the association works with state regulators on a “new interpretation or change the law.”

 

FDCPA Case Ruling on Convenience Fees Having Impact on Collectors
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/fdcpa-case-ruling-on-convenience-fees-having-impact-on-collectors/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Judge Rules Against Collection Law Firm in FDCPA Voicemail Case


In a ruling that could have far-reaching impact on the collection practices of ARM law firms, a district court judge in New York recently allowed an FDCPA lawsuit to advance against a collection attorney over the language used in a pre-recorded voicemail message.

U.S. District Judge Carol Bagley Amon, the Chief Judge in the Eastern District of New York, denied the collection attorney’s motion to dismiss a case that argued the law firm was not allowed to identify itself as a “law office” without meaningful attorney involvement in the case.

In Bard v. Law Offices of Harold E. Scherr, the plaintiff filed a suit claiming damages under the FDCPA over a pre-recorded voicemail the law firm left in an attempt to collect a debt.

The message was as follows:

This message is for Hanna Bard; if you are not Hanna Bard, you should not listen to the rest of this message; this is the Law Office of Harold E. Scherr, a firm which engages in the collection of debt; please call me toll free at 8008588736.

Bard argued that the message was left “without conducting any meaningful review of the account.” Bard’s complaint alleges that defendant falsely represented that the messages were from an attorney, in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e and subsections (3) and (I 0). Bard seeks to certify a class of persons receiving similar prerecorded messages and requests statutory and actual damages, costs, and attorney’s fees.

The judge and both parties agreed that the message was a “communication” under the FDCPA. The Law Offices of Harold E. Scherr is also recognized as a law firm. But Bard’s case hinges on whether an attorney had any meaningful involvement in her account or if the firm was acting strictly as a collection agency.

In its motion to dismiss, the firm noted that that its voicemail message makes no representation regarding Bard’s debt or account which could lead Bard into believing that an attorney had become involved in the debt collection efforts. Further, its message was “designed” with FDCPA compliance in mind; other provisions of the FDCPA require a debt collector to provide its name and to specify that it is engaged in the collection of debt.

Scherr was responding to one of the cases Bard used in support of her claim (Greco v. Trauner – briefly discussed here). In Greco, a Circuit Court held that a disclaimer must be provided in a communication that specifically notes no attorney had reviewed the account. But in that case, the communication in question was a letter. Scherr argued that the case’s legal precedent applied only to letters.

Judge Amon disagreed. She wrote that although “the Second Circuit has not yet examined whether a prerecorded voicemail message by a law firm requires a disclaimer…this Court can find no principle that would justify a distinction between a voicemail message and a letter for purposes of FDCP A liability; in either case, the communication must not misrepresent the extent to which an attorney has become involved in the debt collection process.”

Judge Amon said that since the Second Circuit in Greco made clear that a letter on a law firm’s letterhead without a disclaimer implies attorney involvement, she finds “the prerecorded voicemail in this case may imply a level of attorney or firm involvement in the debt collection process.” Amon said that Bard’s allegations are sufficient to state a claim under the FDCPA and dismissed Scherr’s motion to dismiss.

 

Judge Rules Against Collection Law Firm in FDCPA Voicemail Case
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/judge-rules-against-collection-law-firm-in-fdcpa-voicemail-case/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

LocateSmarter Announces Management Team


A combination of leaders in accounts receivable and technology have come together to launch a new online batch skip trace application. LocateSmarter™, a subsidiary of CBE Companies, announced the members of its management team today.

Chad Benson, President and COO, is co-founder and visionary for LocateSmarter’s formation. “Assembling a talented and passionate team helped bring LocateSmarter to life. The team is focused on solving complex business challenges and mitigating risk in today’s receivables environment,” Benson said. “We’ve developed a cloud-based solution that delivers consumer information from multiple data providers through one centralized platform. It is extremely easy to use for any sized organization.”

With Benson’s background in technology, financial services and accounts receivable, he understands that the emergence of Business-Process-as-a-Service (BPaaS) products can rapidly change the way business is conducted with improved efficiency and effectiveness of online services.

Delivering Leading Data Solutions and User Experience through LocateSmarter

Jessica Phelan has played a key leadership role in directing the product’s research, design and development team since 2011.  She was hired as the first dedicated LocateSmarter employee. As Product Manager, Phelan led a development team to get the project off the ground.  “We’ve had firsthand experience with the challenges of effectively managing a batch skip trace process using multiple data providers within today’s systems environment,” said Phelan.  “With LocateSmarter, our customers have the flexibility to easily customize their workflow.”

In her expanded role as Manager of Product Management and Operations Support, Phelan is responsible for product development, data provider partnerships and delivering an exceptional user experience. She has been in the accounts receivable industry since 2009.

The People, Process and Passion to make the User Experience an Exceptional Journey

Todd Osborn, Director of Sales and Marketing, brings 25 years of executive-level experience in software-as-a-service (SaaS) products and B2B Internet marketing. In his past, Osborn played a key role in launching three IPOs, including Gateway 2000, where he and Benson first connected.  “My first encounter with LocateSmarter was a beta demo. It was quickly apparent to me that it would be a game changer in the accounts receivable industry,” said Osborn.

The most recent addition to the team, Lindsey Newcomb, brings seven years of experience to LocateSmarter. As Marketing Manager, she oversees the marketing strategy and will be instrumental in the launch of LocateSmarter’s social media and content development strategies to engage with users.

Benson said LocateSmarter will soon announce its premier data provider partnerships, as well as key research results from an in-depth study on consumer location data in today’s receivables environment.

Learn more about how LocateSmarter will help businesses become more productive and competitive by viewing a two-minute video at www.locatesmarter.com.

LocateSmarter, LLC., a subsidiary of CBE Companies, was formed in 2012 as a Business-Process-as-a-Service (BpaaS) company with a mission to deliver next generation cloud-based skip trace solutions. The company developed a self-named application that delivers consumer information from multiple data providers in one centralized location. LocateSmarter will be available to credit issuers, healthcare facilities, utility companies, banks, law firms, collection agencies, debt buyers and more. The application will officially launch in September 2014.

LocateSmarter Announces Management Team
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/locatesmarter-announces-management-team/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

DBA International Supports Recent Government Enforcement Actions


DBA International supports the recent enforcement actions reported by the IRS and U.S. Secret Service charging the owner of Florida company United Credit Recovery (UCR) with alleged charges of wire fraud, bribery and money laundering and seeking a monetary judgment of at least $76 million, roughly the amount gained in the fraud.

The government charged the owner with seven counts of alleged wire fraud, 10 counts of bribery of a bank official, and 16 counts of money laundering. According to news reports, UCR and the owner were sued by the attorneys general in Minnesota and Colorado last year.

DBA supports any legal actions against companies that engage in fraudulent behavior and applauds the government for targeting companies like these that prey on consumers. In addition to consumer harm in the UCR action, many accounts receivable management companies were alleged to have been harmed as a result of these unlawful actions.

Demonstrating our commitment to both legal and ethical business practices, DBA’s Debt Buyer Certification Program adopts a national standard for the debt buying industry to help ensure that those who are certified are aware of and are complying with state and federal statutory requirements, responding to consumer complaints and inquiries, and are following debt buying industry best practices.

Responsible and ethical debt buyers act in accordance with laws, regulations and consumer rights. Portraying the action of a company such as UCR as reflective of an entire industry creates a woefully inaccurate picture of reality. The debt buying industry is a critically important segment of the nation’s credit-based economy. This is the reason why DBA thoroughly vets companies applying for DBA membership and requires all members to become certified and follow DBA’s Code of Ethics.

Certification is a priority for DBA as we strive toward improved educational and operational standards within the industry. Additionally, DBA will continue to support enforcement actions against companies that use illegal tactics to collect money they are not legally entitled to collect.

DBA’s Certification Program consists of a company-based designation, the Certified Professional Receivables Company (CPRC), and an individual-based designation, the Certified Receivables Compliance Professional (CRCP).

DBA International is the nonprofit trade association that represents the interests of public and private companies that purchase performing and nonperforming receivables on the secondary market. Founded in 1997 by a small group of companies to provide a forum to advance best practices within the industry, today DBA has grown to represent over 500 companies. DBA provides its members with networking, educational, and legislative advocacy opportunities through an annual conference, an executive summit, regional seminars, state and regional committees, newsletters, webinars, teleconferences, and other media. DBA maintains a code of ethics and a national certification program that promote uniform industry standards of best practice which member companies must comply with in order to maintain membership. DBA is headquartered in Sacramento, California.

More information on the DBA Certification Program is available here.

DBA International Supports Recent Government Enforcement Actions
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-buying-topics/debt-buying/dba-international-supports-recent-government-enforcement-actions/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management