Answers to FAQs – CFPB Funding Case

By now, most of our readers have heard that on May 16, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled that the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) does not violate the ConstitutionIn a prepared statement released on May 17, 2024, Director Chopra laid out what he thinks the SCOTUS opinion means for the CFPB and its focus, but what does this really mean for your organization? Will it impact your day-to-day business? What should ARM industry participants look out for in the future?  In addition to covering Director Chopra’s plans, we’ll answer those and some other Frequently Asked Questions.  

Q: So, what was the ruling? 

A: The SCOTUS opinion is 59 pages discussing the word “appropriations,” what it means historically, and what it means now. The opinion takes the reader on a historical journey from collecting money in the Middle Ages all the way through colonial times and finally to the present day. Ultimately, in an opinion written by Justice Thomas, the Court concluded that “appropriations need only identify a source of public funds and authorize the expenditure of those funds for designated purposes to satisfy the Appropriations Clause.”  

This article from Maurice Wutscher breaks down the legal discussion. If you’d really like to know how we got from the Middle Ages to the present day, though, the full opinion can be found here.

Q: Is there anything in the SCOTUS opinion that will impact the day-to-day of my operation?  

A: In the long run, this opinion will have significant downstream effects once the cases that were on pause while we waited for a decision resume litigation and are ultimately decided. However, those effects will take time to come to fruition.   

[article_ad]

In terms of the impacts of this specific case at this specific time, nothing in this opinion addressed the day-to-day operations or compliance initiatives of those organizations subject to the CFPB’s oversight. This case was literally a debate about what the word “appropriations” means in the context of constitutional interpretation. Though law school students will ultimately be tasked with reading this opinion and will undoubtedly engage in delightful theoretical discussions about it, nothing in the May 16, 2024 ruling should trigger operational or compliance level changes in your organization.  

Q: Does this Ruling mean the Late Fee Rule automatically goes back into effect?   

A: No. Though the SCOTUS decision applies to all things CFPB, it was entered in the Pay Day Lending case, which will now proceed. The Late Fee Rule case is an entirely different case. Thus, the preliminary injunction entered on May 10, 2024, remains intact, but it won’t be for long. We can expect the CFPB to file something soon to ask the court to reconsider the injunction (Editor’s note: as of 8:40 am EST on Monday, May 20, 2024, nothing has been filed to address the issue head-on; we may provide an additional update to this section when the CFPB makes its move). It’s important to note that the plaintiff in that action raised other legal issues beyond the CFPB’s funding, which the TX court might now consider. 

Q: Does the SCOTUS decision automatically mean the CFPB wins all the cases stayed while we waited for a decision? 

A: No, the cases that were stayed will continue once the appropriate document has been filed or entered in each case, but it does not mean the CFPB has won or will win those cases. Each court will then manage its own docket regarding timelines, but the cases will proceed on the other merits raised by the parties. We can certainly expect the CFPB to be very active in litigation in the coming weeks and months. 

Q: What can we expect to see from the CFPB in light of this decision? 

A: The line that keeps running through my head is George W. Bush’s quote upon his reelection in 2004, “’I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it.”  I’d be surprised if Director Chopra weren’t thinking something similar right now. That said, Leader of Clark Hill‘s financial services and regulatory practice and member of insideARM’s Consumer Relations Consortium‘s Legal Advisory Board, Joann Needleman, said it best here: this is like “waking up a bear during hibernation.” In other words, don’t expect the CFPB to slow down anytime soon; expect the opposite. 

In line with these expectations, in prepared remarks published on May 17, 2024, Director Chopra did not mince words for the CFPB’s future, stating: 

  • “Here’s what will happen next. First, the CFPB will be able to forge ahead with our law enforcement work. … The CFPB will continue to focus on repeat offenders, including the individual executives involved in calling the shots. Given our workload, we are increasing the ranks of our enforcement office.” (emphasis added)

  • “Second, our efforts to stop the creep of the junk fees will move ahead.”

  • “Third, expect to see more work when it comes to credit reports and credit scores.” 

  • “And there’s so much more. Whether it’s appraisals or auto loans or mortgages or medical loans, the CFPB will be firing on all cylinders.”

Q: What can I do to protect my organization from increasing CFPB initiatives? 

A: Continue to watch for new areas of focus for the CFPB. Don’t assume they can’t or won’t do anything. Follow the pattern. When they release a statement about finding a problem with something, as they have with medical debt, and most recently with consumer rewards programs, assume there’s something going on behind the scenes, and we should expect some other announcement to follow. Additionally, though margins are tight and compliance personnel aren’t “revenue generators,” ARM organizations should look at their compliance departments and consider whether they are staffed properly to handle current and future compliance issues.  

Q: Is there anything that can be done to curb the CFPB? 

A: ARM industry participants should continue to comment on CFPB initiatives and continue to be vocal about the positive role that the ARM industry plays in the financial ecosystem. The ARM industry is not on its own here. After the SCOTUS decision was released, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Patrick McHenry released a statement which indicated Republicans will continue the fight to rein in the rogue CFPB, and he urged the House to take up Congressman Andy Barr’s CFPB Transparency and Accountability Reform Act, which seeks to fix the mistakes of Dodd-Frank. 

———-

For additional insights on the SCOTUS CFPB funding opinion, read Troutman Pepper’s article here and Ballard Spahr’s article here. We’ll continue to monitor this story and adjacent stories as they develop.  

Answers to FAQs – CFPB Funding Case
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049909-answers-faqs-cfpb-funding-case/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

insideARM Weekly Recap- Week of May 13th, 2024

The ARM industry is never short on surprises. This past week was a perfect example of that and shows how difficult it can be to keep up with the big news and changes week in and week out. That’s why we at insideARM aim to bring you only the biggest stories that we feel you need to know about. Last week we brought you breaking news on the CFPB’s Late Fee Rule and an important Supreme Court ruling on the CFPB’s funding structre, as well as advice on how to handle the aftermath of regulatory examinations, and a surprising development out California. Read on for a breakdown of last week’s news and why we think you need to know about it!

We started the week hot with an article on Monday about news that broke late on Friday May 10th. This news came from the pending litigation in Texas regarding the CFPB’s Late Fee Rule that would cap credit card late fees at $8.00. The suit filed by trade groups challenged the legality of the CFPB’s rule and sought a preliminary injunction to prevent it from going into effect on May 14, 2024. On May 10, 2024, a District Court in Texas granted the trade groups’ request for a preliminary injunction, citing an inability to measure the potential injuries. It is important to note that the Court also took into account the argument that the CFPB’s funding structure has been found to be unconstitutional by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and, therefore, the Late Fee Rule was unconstitutional as it was under that same structure. More on that below with our second breaking news of the week.

The Tuesday news was an article from Bridgeforce about regulatory examinations and enforcement actions. While most discussion on this issue focuses on how to prepare for these examinations and prevent enforcement actions, Bridgeforce instead outlines how best to respond to examination findings, and how to implement corrective actions. The article provides a remediation guideline as well as a step-by-step for remediation. This is especially important as many companies place far more emphasis (for good reason) on prevention and may not have a plan for if corrective actions are required.

On Wednesday, we elevated an article from Troutman Pepper regarding a law proposed by California’s DFPI that was denied by the Office of Administrative Law (“OAL”). The legislation would have classified Earned Wage Access products (services that provide employees with early access to their wages) as “loans.” If EWA were considered loans that would subject these services to greater regulation. The CFPB had also recently expressed support for the legislation but the OAL did not adhere to the necessary procedures or clarity standard set forth by the APA. This is noteworthy for two reasons: 1. It is always a surprise when legislation with broad support is rejected; and 2. The CFPB’s public support of the proposal may signal that EWA’s are a future focus of the Bureau.

Thursday provided another shake-up as we brought you news of the Supreme Court determining that the CFPB’s funding structure is constitutional as well as instant reactions from an industry veteran. The Court overruled a 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision and held that the CFPB’s structure satisfies the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution. The CFPB called the decision a “victory for American families.” While this is a big win for the CFPB, this decision will serve as a lesson for the industry for future challenges of CFPB authority. Most importantly, the Supreme Court’s ruling will have a major effect on current litigation that has been stayed because of the 5th Circuit’s previous ruling, including the Late Fee case in Texas from Tuesday’s news.

We appreciate you coming to us for your news and this weekly recap. Have more to catch up on? A recap of the news from the week of May 6th can be found here.

Have a topic you want to discuss? Need advice on an issue? Want to make sure your voice is heard on developing problems in the industry? insideARM’s Research Assistant has a weekly Peer Group Meeting for just that! Unsure if it is right for you? We also offer a one-month free trial!

insideARM Weekly Recap- Week of May 13th, 2024
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049908-insidearm-weekly-recap-week-may-13th-2024/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

RNN Group Appoints Proven Industry Leader Autumn V. Bloom as Vice President of Operations

ATLANTA, Ga. — RNN Group, a leading provider of advanced data solutions within the receivables management industry, today announced the appointment of Autumn V. Bloom as Vice President of Operations. Ms. Bloom brings over two decades of strategic leadership to the role, with a proven record of operational excellence, innovation, and dedication to compliance.Autumn Bloom

Ms. Bloom began her career in receivables management with a major debt purchaser and master servicer, where she spent 24 years in progressive leadership roles. Rising to Vice President of Operations, she spearheaded the ongoing development and management of the company’s attorney and collection agency network, consumer call center, litigation operation, media operations, and client services departments. Her success stemmed from a combination of strong quantitative analysis, collaborative leadership, and a focus on data-driven decision-making in the areas of litigation, direct-to-consumer, and collection agency strategies.

Ms. Bloom’s impact on the receivables management landscape extends beyond her previous executive role. A sought-after leader, she is an RMAi Certified Receivables Compliance Professional (CRCP) and an active member of the Receivables Management Association International (RMAI). Within RMAI, she served two terms as Chairperson of the Public Relations & Marketing Committee, was a member of the Certification Council, served on the Membership Committee and currently contributes to the Educational Committee.

[article_ad]

Prior to joining RNN Group, Ms. Bloom served as Chief Compliance Officer for a prominent Florida-based collections law firm. In this capacity, she oversaw the firm’s comprehensive compliance management program, managed human resources initiatives, and spearheaded client services operations. Her focus on policy development, vendor audits, state expansion, and the launch of a national attorney network platform ensured the firm’s adherence to ethical standards and best practices.

In her role as Vice President of Operations for RNN Group, Ms. Bloom will shape the company’s future by optimizing internal processes and driving strategic growth. Collaborating with the CEO, she will play a pivotal role in defining RNN’s mission and objectives. Her responsibilities include oversight of all operational activities, implementation of robust compliance frameworks, external vendor relationship management, and product development. Ms. Bloom’s commitment to innovation and her ability to identify new technological solutions, including AI and automation, will position RNN Group as a leader within the receivables space.

“Autumn’s impressive background aligns perfectly with RNN Group’s vision,” said Jim Van Schaik, CEO of RNN Group. “Her expertise in streamlining operations, maximizing performance, and ensuring regulatory compliance will be instrumental as we continue to innovate and expand our services within the financial industry.”

About RNN Group

RNN Group is an Atlanta-based company specializing in technologically advanced solutions for the financial industry. Leveraging cutting-edge data analytics and advanced technology processes, RNN Group provides consumer verification, skip tracing, and other necessary tools for its clients. Their commitment to efficiency, security, and ethical practices empowers clients within the legal, financial, and government sectors to achieve their business objectives. To learn more, visit https://rnngroup.com/

Contact: 

Autumn V. Bloom 
Vice President of Operations 
RNN Group 
(513) 258-9799 
autumnb@rnngroup.com

RNN Group Appoints Proven Industry Leader Autumn V. Bloom as Vice President of Operations
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049905-rnn-group-appoints-proven-industry-leader/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Breaking: SCOTUS says CFPB Funding is Constitutional; CFPB Provides Comments

The Supreme Court has spoken: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) funding mechanism is constitutional. In its long-awaited ruling in the case of Community Financial Services Association of America Ltd. v. CFPB, the Court held that the CFPB’s funding structure satisfies the Appropriations Clause of the United States Constitution. The CFPB provided its comments via a press release shortly after the Supreme Court published its opinion

Calling the legal arguments raised in the case a “radical theory that would have devastated the American financial markets,” the decision sends a message that the CFPB is here to stay. Making its position clear, the statement goes on to say,  “Today’s decision is a resounding victory for American families and honest businesses alike, ensuring that consumers are protected from predatory corporations and that markets are fair, transparent, and competitive.”

Providing some broad insight into its future aims, the CFPB says it will “continue carrying out the vital consumer protection work Congress charged us to perform for the American people.”

As for the case itself, the Supreme Court directed that the legal proceedings shall continue. 

You can read the full opinion here and the CFPB’s press release here.

————-

Here are some initial thoughts from Joann Needleman, an avid watcher of the CFPB, a former member of the CFPB Consumer Advisory Board, a member at Clark Hill, and a Consumer Relations Consortium Legal Advisory Board Member.

Thoughts (From Joann Needleman):

  • That Justice Thomas authored the opinion suggests how weak the industry’s argument was. He has, in other opinions, been very skeptical of the power of administrative agencies. This challenge was about the definition of appropriations, or at least this is how CSFA wanted to frame. They failed and it was evident in oral argument. He spent his entire opinion writing the history lesson of appropriations, basically saying to CFSA, you failed to do your homework.
  • Kagen added that nothing in the history put any limits on appropriations (i.e. timing and amounts).
  • Justice Jackson takes a swipe addressing separation of powers and basically says, stop coming to the court for every little discrepancy. Maybe a swipe to the other justices when they involve the major questions doctrine.  Here however, there really is no separation of powers.  
  • Alito’s and Gorsuch’s dissent basically provide future Congressional direction for agency appropriation. 

 Takeaways (From Joann Needleman):

  • Court has closed the book on whether there should be a CFPB. However, there seems to be an appetite for challenges on how they wield power. Thomas was very clear that his opinion addressed only the narrow issue of what does it mean to “appropriate”.
  • The battle for the credit card late fee rule is back in play. The Texas District Court stayed the case based on this Supreme Court decision and for nothing more. There are a few other cases that are stayed pending this case and I expect to see more litigation about the CFPB’s authority.
  • The decision is not surprising and it will not be surprising to the CFPB. They have been quietly coordinating behind the scenes, especially around supervision, to really unleash once this decision came out.
  • It will be like waking up a bear during hibernation.

————————-

insideARM Perspective

This is a developing story. Several cases were stayed or had decisions issued based on the Fifth Circuit’s opinion, most recently a case that came out last Friday granting a preliminary injunction halting the CFPB’s Late Fee Rule. This decision will have downstream effects across the legal landscape and the financial services industry. We will continue to bring you insights, analysis, and key takeaways in the coming days. 

Breaking: SCOTUS says CFPB Funding is Constitutional; CFPB Provides Comments
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049903-breaking-scotus-says-cfpb-funding-constit/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

VeriFacts Sponsors 4th Annual Run For Brain Health Event Supporting National Alliance on Mental Illness

STERLING, Ill. — VeriFacts will once again be sponsoring the Run for Brain Health 5k in 2024. As the 4th annual event, VeriFacts will not only be a financial sponsor but will also be represented by its Director of Business Development, Traci Oltmans, at the race on Saturday, May 18th

“This is truly an incredible event. I am so proud of the VeriFacts team for sponsoring this run and even more excited to participate myself,” Traci Oltmans said. “All proceeds of this event will go to the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Sauk Valley. NAMI has done amazing work in the area, and continues to be a lifeline for those struggling with mental illness across the country.”

The Race For Change

Mental health is a vital aspect of overall well-being, yet it’s often overlooked or stigmatized. Events like the Run for Brain Health serve as a powerful reminder that mental health matters and that the community needs to support initiatives that promote awareness, education, and access to resources for those struggling with mental illness. NAMI Sauk Valley plays a pivotal role in this mission by providing support, advocacy, and education to individuals and families affected by mental health conditions.

The funds raised from this event directly contribute to NAMI Sauk Valley’s programs and services, which include support groups, educational seminars, crisis intervention, and community outreach. These resources are lifelines for many, offering a sense of belonging, understanding, and hope in times of difficulty. 

Sponsorship That Makes a Difference

VeriFacts’ sponsorship of the 4th Annual Run for Brain Health underscores their commitment to community well-being and mental health advocacy. By lending their support to this event, VeriFacts not only showcases their corporate responsibility but also amplifies the impact of the run. 

Their sponsorship enables the event to reach a wider audience, fostering greater awareness about mental health issues and the resources available through NAMI Sauk Valley. Through their sponsorship, VeriFacts helps ensure that vital resources such as support groups, educational seminars, and crisis intervention remain accessible to those in need. Their ongoing commitment to this cause not only provides financial assistance but also sends a message of solidarity and support to individuals and families affected by mental illness. 

Donate and Support

To donate toward the 5k Run for Brain Health, visit the event’s donation page on Race Roster. Each donation will 100% be committed toward NAMI Sauk Valley and will help foster a more positive and supportive community. To learn more about VeriFacts’ other community initiatives, please visit its News reel and browse through the many community articles and resources available. 

About VeriFacts

VeriFacts, LLC is the top employment location and verification service for the receivables management industry. Having been in business for over 30 years, they are committed to offering guaranteed customer location and employment verification services to creditors across the nation. The VeriFacts brand has become synonymous with high-quality service and a positive customer experience. Over the years, their services have expanded into residential location information, data verification, and unique data aggregation.

VeriFacts Sponsors 4th Annual Run For Brain Health Event Supporting National Alliance on Mental Illness
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049902-verifacts-sponsors-4th-annual-run-brain-h/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

California DFPI’s Proposed EWA Legislation Rejected by Office of Administrative Law

As discussed here, in March 2023, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) proposed new regulations under the California Financing Law that would interpret the definition of “loan” to include “income-based advances” or earned wage access (EWA) products, except those offered by employers. The proposal also sought to require providers of such products to register with the state, and imposed requirements on debt settlement companies and education financing providers.

However, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) has recently disapproved this regulatory action. The OAL found that the proposed regulations failed to comply with the clarity standard of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and that the DFPI did not follow the required APA procedures.

Background

The DFPI’s proposal was part of a broader effort to regulate EWA products, which are increasingly popular financial services that allow employees to access their earned wages before payday. The proposal aimed to classify these products as loans, which would subject them to additional regulatory oversight.

In November 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) submitted a comment letter to the DFPI supporting the proposal. The CFPB agreed with the DFPI’s classification of income-based advances as loans and the requirement for providers to register with the state. The CFPB stated that the DFPI’s proposal to define “charges” under the California Financing Law to include “gratuities” and “expedite fees,” would align with the Truth in Lending Act (TILA).

OAL Ruling

The OAL found that the proposed regulations did not meet the clarity standard of the APA, which requires that regulations be written so that they can be easily understood by those who must comply with them.

The OAL also found that the DFPI did not follow the required APA procedures in proposing the regulations. The APA sets out specific procedures that agencies must follow when proposing new regulations, including providing notice to the public and allowing for public comment.

Implications

The OAL’s disapproval means that, for now, EWA products in California will not be formally classified as loans and specific registration requirement expressly applicable to EWA providers will not exist. However, the DFPI may choose to revise and resubmit the proposal in compliance with the APA’s clarity standard and procedural requirements. As it has done in the past, the DFPI may also take enforcement action against providers who claim their products are not loans covered by the California Financing Law, where the DFPI disagrees with that position.

It’s also worth noting that the CFPB’s support for the DFPI’s proposal suggests that it may consider similar regulations at the federal level.

California DFPI’s Proposed EWA Legislation Rejected by Office of Administrative Law
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049897-california-dfpis-proposed-ewa-legislation/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

P&B Capital Group Extends Support to P.U.N.T. Pediatric Cancer Collaborative and Zach Liberatore Foundation

WEST SENECA, N.Y. — P&B Capital Group recently expanded its community involvement initiatives to support two significant foundations dedicated to enhancing community well-being. With a keen focus on pediatric cancer support and mental health advocacy, the company’s donations to the P.U.N.T. Pediatric Cancer Collaborative and the Zach Liberatore Foundation underscore its commitment to making a tangible difference in the lives of individuals facing formidable challenges.

“By extending our support to the PUNT Pediatric Cancer Collaborative and the Zach Liberatore Foundation, we hope to improve the lives of those in our immediate community and the global community as we all fight against pediatric cancer and mental health issues. ” – Ryan Kazmark, Managing Partner, P&B Capital Group

PUNT Pediatric Cancer Collaborative: Championing Support

The PUNT Pediatric Cancer Collaborative (formerly known as the PUNT Foundation) stands as a beacon of hope for children and families navigating the unthinkable journey of pediatric cancer. Established with the mission to provide comprehensive support to young cancer warriors and their families, the foundation offers a myriad of services ranging from financial assistance to emotional support programs. By contributing to initiatives that alleviate the burden of pediatric cancer, P&B aims to not only foster hope but also empower families to navigate their challenges with resilience and strength.

Zach Liberatore Foundation: Advocating for Mental Health Awareness and Prevention

Named in honor of Zach Liberatore, who tragically lost his life to suicide, the foundation is dedicated to promoting mental health awareness, suicide prevention, and addiction prevention. The Zach Liberatore Foundation aims to destigmatize mental health struggles and empower individuals to seek help without fear or shame by championing initiatives that foster dialogue, education, and support networks. Through targeted interventions and community outreach programs, the foundation strives to create a culture of compassion and understanding surrounding mental health issues.

A Unified Vision for Community Empowerment

As P&B Capital Group continues to expand its footprint in the realm of corporate social responsibility, contributions to the PUNT Collaborative and the Zach Liberatore Foundation serve as a testament to its values-driven approach to business. By leveraging resources and expertise to support initiatives that uplift and empower communities, the company embodies the spirit of compassionate leadership and civic engagement.

About P&B Capital Group

P&B Capital Group, LLC is a nationally licensed, third-party collection agency that services non-performing accounts receivable and loan portfolios with compliance, transparency, and respect. They help consumers understand and resolve their financial obligations while providing improved cash flow for their creditor clients.

P&B Capital Group Extends Support to P.U.N.T. Pediatric Cancer Collaborative and Zach Liberatore Foundation

http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049895-pb-capital-group-extends-support-punt-ped/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

How to Remediate Regulatory Exam Findings in Financial Services

Corrective actions are a common requirement following regulatory examination findings and enforcement actions (e.g., MRAs and consent orders), regardless of how proactive an organization may be. Therefore, you must use a systematic approach to provide evidence of successful risk remediation and effective controls. This article shows how to develop and execute remediation plans.

Strategic Remediation: A Proven Approach to Corrective Action Planning and Sustainability

Even the most proactive organizations have examination findings with required corrective actions. Organizations can effectively remediate regulatory exam findings by developing a methodical approach that facilitates effective and sustainable solutions.

For over two decades, Bridgeforce has swiftly resolved thousands of internal and external audit findings for both top-tier global banks and mid-size lenders and credit unions. Our team, comprised of former regulatory, operations, and IT executives, specializes in process reengineering, automation introduction, training provision, and the development of policies, procedures and controls to ensure compliance.

The Bridgeforce program offers concrete proof that reported risks have been effectively remediated and that the implemented controls are functioning effectively. While most clients understand what needs to be done, the challenge often lies in knowing how to do it effectively.

Establish a Project Infrastructure: The Key to Sustainable Corrective Action Planning

An established project infrastructure will lay the foundation for successful project execution by promoting efficiency, communication, documentation, and stakeholder satisfaction. It provides a solid framework that supports the entire project lifecycle, from initiation to completion.

Establish this framework by centralizing the management and evaluation of findings, creating project governance, and building your remediation team(s):

Create Centralized Management & Evaluation of Findings

Form a small task force with working knowledge of the functional areas impacted. Part of the team should evaluate findings and communicate individual responsibilities as other group members distill the information and begin formal remediation planning. By consolidating exam findings, you can prioritize efforts and address them in the form of a single comprehensive reference document.

Establish Project Governance

It’s crucial to establish a dedicated core project team. This could be a single project manager (PM) with partial allocation or a fully dedicated project management office (PMO). These resources act as the central command for the remediation task force. Project team members drive toward the collective goal of preparedness to meet the demands of examination finding remediation.

Build Remediation Team(s)

After categorizing and prioritizing findings, form remediation teams to address them. The team size, ranging from a few key individuals to multiple groups across various areas, depends on the remediation effort’s scale. We advise assigning roles and structuring the team based on the effort’s size.

These are the key roles for the team:

  • Work Stream Lead
  • Remediation Manager
  • Remediation Team Members
  • Business Area Subject Matter Expert
  • Reporting and Technology Owner

Establish Reporting Strategy

Effective reporting is critical to ensure that all stakeholders are informed about remediation progress and any obstacles in satisfying remediation obligations. When regulatory enforcement results in a consent order, the sanctioned entity will be required to provide frequent updates to the regulator. So, we recommend defining a reporting strategy with an inventory of reports and dashboards that include a description of each report, information/data sources, its purpose, audience and frequency. The strategy should also include clear procedures for how reports are generated and the approval hierarchy to be executed before reports are submitted to regulators.

4 Steps to Implement Corrective Actions that Remediate Regulatory Exam Findings

Step 1: Gather all internal and external audit findings along with ongoing action plans. Then, use this information to create a consolidated master list, which aids in prioritizing tasks, assigning ownership, and driving results. Create a task plan and issue review process.

Step 2: Gain stakeholder consensus on the remediation process. This may include a temporary halt or the initiation of new reviews (2nd/3rd line of defense) for areas within the agreed-upon scope. The process for self-identified issues continues as usual.

Step 3: Execute the remediation process, achieve issue closure through a tollgate process, and continue to identify further improvements to controls, procedures, and processes.

Step 4: Start recertification activities. These will verify and certify that the resolved issues remain closed, and they’ll ensure the implementation of all other ongoing enhancements for sustainability.

Proactive Mitigation of Examination Findings: A Systematic Approach to Compliance and Operational Excellence

A systematic approach to exam findings remediation not only reduces the burden of exam findings but also ensures sustainability. Initiating remediation while an exam is ongoing can lessen the impact on business operations.

By implementing a robust project management methodology, remediation efforts can be managed systematically. This environment establishes clear roles and responsibilities for resources, ensuring that corrective actions are promptly and thoroughly executed. This approach reduces the time spent on each issue, allowing managers and strategists to focus on business growth.

While examination findings are inevitable, proactive measures can mitigate their impact. You’ll achieve this by promptly addressing issues, preparing for future exams, and fostering a culture of operational control excellence. This strategy significantly reduces the risk of costly fines and extensive remediation activities, and it can improve relations with regulatory bodies.

How to Remediate Regulatory Exam Findings in Financial Services
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049892-how-remediate-regulatory-exam-findings-fi/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Finvi Announces Partnership with TCN as Preferred Partner for Contact Center Services

BURLINGTON, Mass.– Finvi, the leading provider of enterprise solutions that streamline and accelerate revenue recovery for clients across the accounts receivable management (ARM) industry and healthcare markets, today announced a new partnership with TCN, a leading provider of omnichannel contact center solutions, and Finvi’s preferred provider of contact center software, communications platform and associated software products. TCN and Finvi have established this partnership to deliver integrated Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) across its client base.

Both Finvi and TCN are well-established and respected companies in the revenue recovery industry. Finvi has a long history of providing innovative and effective revenue recovery solutions to its clients, while TCN is a leader in omnichannel contact center solutions. This partnership brings together two industry leaders to provide customers with a more comprehensive solution for their revenue recovery needs.

TCN’s solution will be deeply integrated with Finvi’s products and services, providing customers with a comprehensive solution to suit their revenue recovery needs. This includes API-based, real-time integration with Velosidy, Finvi’s new SaaS collections and payments platform for the ARM industry. 

“We are incredibly excited to partner with TCN to provide our customers with seamless access to their industry-leading omnichannel contact center solutions,” said Tim O’Brien, CEO of Finvi. “TCN Operator is a best-in-class solution, and its integration into our core workflow applications will provide our customers with a truly seamless and unified experience.”

“We are thrilled to be Finvi’s preferred CCaaS partner,” said Terrel Bird, CEO of TCN. “Finvi is a leader in enterprise solutions for revenue recovery, and we are confident that TCN Operator will help Finvi customers improve their customer experience and achieve their business goals.” 

The partnership is expected to benefit both Finvi and TCN customers. Over the coming months, their common customer base will realize the benefits of an optimized business workflow, achieving increased agent productivity and management visibility through seamless integration. 

About Finvi

Finvi is a leading provider of enterprise technologies that streamline and accelerate revenue recovery for clients across the accounts receivable management (ARM), healthcare, and government markets. Finvi’s solutions help businesses to improve customer engagement, streamline communications, and increase compliance. For more information, please visit www.finvi.com.

About TCN

TCN is a global leader in cloud-based contact center solutions for accounts receivable management (ARM), healthcare providers, enterprises, contact centers and BPOs. TCN’s comprehensive suite includes omnichannel solutions, automation, predictive dialers, IVR, Click2Pay, compliance solutions and real-time analytics, driving operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.

TCN promises immediate access to the latest TCN Operator platform, facilitating seamless scalability. With a commitment to excellence and a dedication to meet evolving business needs from start to finish through industry-leading customer service, TCN continues to redefine the contact center landscape. For further details, visit www.tcn.com

Finvi Announces Partnership with TCN as Preferred Partner for Contact Center Services
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049893-finvi-announces-partnership-tcn-preferred/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance

Late Fee Rule Halted by TX Court

Late on Friday, May 10, 2024, a District Court in Texas entered an order stopping the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Late Fee Rule (Rule), which would slash credit card late fees to $8.00, from going into effect on May 14, 2024. The Order says the injunction is warranted because of the CFPB’s funding structure and because the injuries created by the Rule, if it were to go into effect tomorrow, could not be practicably measured. 

Upon its release, the Rule was widely criticized for both the CFPB’s alleged failure to follow the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and for its significant operational impacts. The announcement of the Final Rule on credit card late fees sparked an immediate reaction. A collective of trade groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, Longview Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association, the Consumer Bankers Association, and Texas Association of Business (collectively, the Trade Groups) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas challenging the Rule.

The Trade Groups alleged they were entitled to a preliminary injunction because of the CFPB’s funding structure, and the Rule violates the  Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD Act), the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), and APA. More specifically, the Trade Groups argued that because the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had previously held that the CFPB’s funding structure is unconstitutional, any rule passed under that same funding structure, including the Late Fee Rule, is likewise unconstitutional. 

The Court agreed with the Trade Group’s argument regarding the CFPB’s funding argument and did not address the CARD Act, TILA, and APA claims. That said, standing alone, the funding issue is not enough to meet the legal threshold for a preliminary injunction. To meet that threshold, there must be an irreparable injury and an examination of the relative harm of both parties. 

In reviewing the Rule and the arguments of the parties, the Court held that should the Rule go into effect on May 14, 2024, there would indeed be an irreparable injury.  Per the Court, “The issue isn’t so much that the Plaintiffs’ injury could never be repaired by damages, but that damages for their injury could not practicably be measured.” Because damages would not be able to be computed, the Court found that the Trade Groups met their legal burden on this factor.

Finally, the Court reviewed the “relative harm to both parties” if the injunction were to be granted or denied. In its examination, the Court reasoned that entering the injunction would cause less harm to the CFPB than to the Trade Groups. Specifically, if it denied the injunction, the Trade Groups would face an enormous undertaking based upon a potentially unconstitutional rule. However, if the Court were to grant an injunction, the CFPB would be relatively unaffected because the  Rule has not yet gone into effect.

Since the Trade Groups met their legal burden, the Court entered a preliminary injunction effectively stopping the Late Fee Rule from becoming effecitve tomorrow, May 14, 2024. 

You can read the full Opinion and Order here

insideARM Perspective

The Opinion and Order in this matter should not be construed to mean that the Court Disagrees with the policy behind the Rule. Interested parties should take note of footnote 1, which states, “Importantly, the Court offers no opinion and has no opinion as to whether the CFPB’s Final Rule reducing the credit card late fee cap is good or bad policy, as that is irrelevant to the Court’s analysis.” Coupled with the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the CFPB funding case in October of 2023, and is expected to issue its ruling in 2024, the effects of this ruling may be short-lived. We will continue to watch for developments.  

Late Fee Rule Halted by TX Court
http://www.insidearm.com/news/00049890-late-fee-rule-halted-tx-court/
http://www.insidearm.com/news/rss/
News

All the latest in collections news updates, analysis, and guidance