Archives for January 2015

NCLC Calls for Outright Ban on the Collection of Time-Barred Debt


A report released Thursday by the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) urges the CFPB to prohibit debt collectors from attempting to seek payment on accounts that are beyond the statute of limitations. It’s a reiteration of recommendations the group made in response to the CFPB’s advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) for debt collection last year.

Underscoring exactly what the group is calling for, the report’s introduction includes the following passage, in bold and with the emphasis shown:

“…the CFPB should ban all efforts to collect out-of-statute debt—whether by litigation or other means.”

The report, “Zombie Debt: What the CFPB Should Do about Attempts to Collect Old Debt,” notes that statutes of limitations on debt vary widely state-to-state, leading to confusion among consumers. Two states, Mississippi and Wisconsin, even have laws that already extinguish the debt once the statute of limitations has run.

NCLC also calls out the prevalence of time-barred debt in the collection system, mostly due to the practices of debt buyers.

The report calls on the CFPB to use its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to define time-barred debt collection as an unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practice (UDAAP), thus making it illegal.

The group called for an outright ban on time-barred debt collection in its extensive public comment to the CFPB’s ANPR for debt collection regulations. Like in that comment, the NCLC concedes that the CFPB is unlikely to go that far in its rulemaking and makes other suggestions should the Bureau not ban out-of-statute collection altogether.

The recommendations include codifying existing law by writing a rule that bars the filing or threat of a lawsuit to collect old debt. It also notes that offers of settlement should be treated the same way, even thought that is not part of current law.

The proposal for the treatment of settlement offers follows a string of confusing Circuit Court rulings on the matter. NCLC’s recommendations align with courts that have ruled that a settlement offer on a time-barred account, without proper disclosure, could be deceptive and misleading.

NCLC’s report also calls for the CFPB to go a step further in rules concerning the legal collection of time-barred debt; it wants to prohibit collection lawsuits on debt that has been reaged with a payment.

In addition, the group wants to ban the sale of time-barred accounts. “Once a debt is time-barred, creditors, debt buyers, and debt collectors should also be banned from reselling the debt to another debt buyer or debt collector,” the report reads.

Finally, the report calls for a wide range of very strong disclosures for consumers if the account being collected is out-of-statute. On every communication (not just the initial), NCLC wants the following disclosure:

IMPORTANT NOTE –

  • We cannot sue you to collect this debt because it is too old.
  • But if you pay us anything or agree that you owe the debt, we may be able to sue you for the entire debt.

In addition to a rights disclosure, the NCLC wants a series of disclosures concerning credit reporting made in every communication concerning old debt. In short, the NCLC is looking for language that will tell consumers that their credit score may not improve if the debt is paid.

If the debt is being reported, the suggested language is:

  • Paying this debt will not remove it from your credit report, but will only show that the account has been paid.
  • Paying this debt may not improve your credit record or score.

If the debt is not being reported to credit bureau:

  • This debt does not show up on your credit report.
  • Paying this debt will not help your credit record or score.

 

 

NCLC Calls for Outright Ban on the Collection of Time-Barred Debt
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/nclc-calls-for-outright-ban-on-the-collection-of-time-barred-debt/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

ACLU Sues Georgia County and Collection Agency Over Debt Collection Practices


The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Thursday announced that it has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the debt collection practices of an Atlanta-area county and the debt collection agency it uses to recover court fines and probation fees.

The suit was brought on behalf of Kevin Thompson, a teenager in DeKalb County, Ga., who was jailed because he could not afford to pay fines and fees stemming from a traffic ticket. The case, Thompson v. DeKalb County, was filed in U.S. District Court in Atlanta. It names DeKalb County, Chief Judge Nelly Withers of the DeKalb County Recorders Court, and Judicial Correction Services, Inc. as defendants.

Thompson’s license was suspended after failing to appear in court in April 2014 for what the complaint says was a minor traffic violation. He resolved that issue, but forgot to file the proper paperwork to get his license reinstated. In July, he was pulled over by a DeKalb County police officer who informed him that his license was suspended. As such, he was arrested for driving on a suspended license. He spent one night in jail.

In October, he appeared in court and pled guilty to driving on a suspended license. His sentence was an $810 fine that he could not pay that day. The judge said that he had 30 days to pay the fine, during which time he would be on probation and would have to report to a private probation firm, Judicial Correction Services (JCS).

Thompson reported to JCS every week and paid small amounts against his debt. On December 4, 2014, he reported but could not pay. At that point, JCS initiated a revocation of probation and filed it with the court. The suit claims that JCS incorrectly advised Thompson that a public defender would cost an additional $150, so he waived his right to defense.

On December 8, he was sentenced to 10 days in jail, with one day removed for time already served. He ended up spending five days in jail.

The ACLU suit seeks damages from the county and JCS. It also wants to shine a light on debt collection practices used by local government counties and the private ARM businesses they employ to force people into paying fines and fees against the real threat of jail time.

ACLU Sues Georgia County and Collection Agency Over Debt Collection Practices
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/govt-receivables/municipal-receivables/aclu-sues-georgia-county-and-collection-agency-over-debt-collection-practices/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

CSS Releases IMPACT! HD 2.0 Portfolio Manager- Compliance Plus


CSS, Inc., proudly introduces its IMPACT! HD 2.0 Portfolio Manager- Compliance Plus.

The industry’s premier ARM+Debt Collections platform continues to take charge and leadership in the market by providing an advanced Debt Portfolio Management System with an impressive integrated Compliance module to meet and exceed regulatory requirements.

As Debt Buyers are increasingly being considered & in the path of being regulated as “Collection Agencies”, it is incumbent on Debt Buyers concerned with being compliant in their practices, whether managing portfolios as a Seller, Buyer, or Investor, to utilize a platform that is compliant with and promotes the industry’s best collections practices.

CSS IMPACT’s Debt Buyer offering, IMPACT! HD™ 2.0 Portfolio Manager|Compliance Plus, is an integrated IMPACT! HD™ 2.0 solution offering, so it’s processes, workflows, assignments, forwarding, vendor management and overall management of Portfolios are part of an integrated suite of solutions that make up the industry’s most Robust, Dynamic & Scalable Portfolio Management Recoveries & Collections platform.

Key features of our Debt Manager Portfolio module included as user friendly dashboards and reports: ROI & IRR tracking, Repurchase & Recourse Timeline Audits, Portfolio Sample Matching, Score & Index Samples, Packaging & Reselling, and Portfolio Inventory Source Tracking,  to name a few.

For your personalized demo, please visit CSS IMPACT! at the DBA conference, booth no. 619, Aria Hotel, Las Vegas, February 3-5th, 2015.

CSS Releases IMPACT! HD 2.0 Portfolio Manager- Compliance Plus
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-buying-topics/debt-buying/css-releases-impact-hd-2-0-portfolio-manager-compliance-plus/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Is There a “Silver Bullet” for Defeating FDCPA and TCPA Claims?


Collection agencies and debt buyers continue to be inundated with FDCPA and TCPA lawsuits, many of which drag on through months and even years of expensive discovery and motion practice. What if there existed a single argument that could be made in many consumer cases that would successfully remove the matter from Court and likely end the case in its entirety?

Surprisingly, such an argument exists, though it is often overlooked in the defense of debt collectors and debt buyers.

A broad array of consumer contracts include arbitration clauses requiring that certain consumer disputes be resolved through arbitration rather than Court proceedings.  Recent United States Supreme Court precedent supports enforcement of such arbitration clauses.  Depending on the exact wording of the arbitration clause, motions to compel arbitration of FDCPA, TCPA, and other consumer litigation may succeed where other arguments fail.

Further, in a putative class action – such as a TCPA class action – if some of the purported class members are subject to an arbitration clause, this alone may be sufficient to defeat class certification.

In the latest episode of the Debt Collection Drill, attorney John Rossman discusses a recent victory for a collection agency in a motion to compel arbitration, along with strategies for successfully crafting this argument, with special guest attorney Jim Bedell from Moss & Barnett.

Listen to the 10-minute podcast below:


http://traffic.libsyn.com/thedrill/TDCD_ep44.wav.mp3

(If you cannot see the audio player above, please download the file directly at http://traffic.libsyn.com/thedrill/TDCD_ep44.wav.mp3.

Is There a “Silver Bullet” for Defeating FDCPA and TCPA Claims?
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-collection-news/debt-collection/is-there-a-silver-bullet-for-defeating-fdcpa-and-tcpa-claims/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Business Valuation: What is it, and do I need one?


Kaulkin Ginsberg

Kaulkin Ginsberg

How much is my business worth?  This seemingly simple, straight-forward question has vastly different answers depending on whom or why you’re asking.  For owners, the answer might be based more upon the year of hard work invested in their business than its current performance.  For buyers, the answer could be influenced by the direction they believe they can take the business under their ownership.

Many owners say it doesn’t matter what value is placed upon their business today since they don’t plan to sell it, or their kids are going to take over someday.  Others will explain that an eventual sale is many years away so they won’t address it now.

This attitude is all too common among owners of accounts receivable management (ARM). Unfortunately, waiting until you’re ready to sell the business to gauge value – or when you find out that your kids have no intention of taking over – could be a very costly mistake that cannot be corrected.

A valuation establishes the worth for an entire business, or partial interest, by evaluating its historical and anticipated future financial performance.  For ARM companies, appraisers must factor in market conditions, client trends and regulations impacting their specific line of business.

There are typically four situations to consider when deciding if you should conduct a business valuation: transaction, taxation, regulation, and litigation:

Transaction – This is when most owners look to a business valuation to establish a basis for themselves or their partners prior to a partial or outright sale of their business. In this situation, a valuation provides a conclusion of value that is expressed as a single number, or a range of values. This is useful for determining the fair market value of a business and aiding in the negotiation of deal terms and structure with a perspective buyer. That being said, waiting until the final hour to determine the value of your business is not recommended. Instead, annual valuations allow you to determine current value, and identify how far you have to go to reach your financial goals. The last thing you want is to be close to retiring and excited to cash in on your hard work, only to learn that the business is worth a fraction of what you thought.

Taxation – In many cases, the value of a closely-held business becomes an individual’s primary asset, and should be protected from undue exposure to taxation. For example, you may plan on leaving your business or portion of the business to your kids and other family members. Failing to properly set up your estate could lead to excessive taxation on inheritance or transfer of ownership rights. Historic and current tax court cases have shown that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allows for significant discounts in value – calculated by a certified valuation analyst (CVA) – to be taken when reporting assets on an individual’s estate or gift tax return. The potential tax savings from this process could be hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of dollars. However, to take advantage of these savings, a comprehensive estate or financial plan must be in place that accounts for the business value.

Regulation – In a buy-sell agreement, or buy-sell clause, an operating agreement exists in almost every business. This establishes the methodology used by the partners or shareholders for the disposition of a departing or deceased party. A formal business valuation would assist the partnership or corporation by addressing items like the events that trigger a buyout, the funding for a buyout, and the methodology for valuing the business interest. By preparing ahead of time, you can avoid disruptions to the business that impact revenue generating activities and protect all parties involved.

Litigation Litigation may come in any number of forms, but the result is the same: lots of stress, business distractions and it may even cause more than a few grey hairs (or worse, hair loss). Fortunately, having a CVA perform periodic business valuations and assist in formal business planning can alieve some of this stress.  In this situation, attorneys need CVAs to determine the value of a business or business interest before they can move forward with the litigation process. For ARM companies, these instances typically include contract and partnership disputes, but other issues arise such as divorces, injury cases, and dissenting shareholder actions. Hiring a valuation expert with undisputed industry expertise may be the difference between being on the winning or losing end of a dispute.

If you find yourself in any of these situations, or you simply want to determine the market value of your business, a professional valuation could be your next step. For a confidential discussion of your valuation needs, consult Topline Valuation Group, LLC. Topline is a new company founded by ARM industry expert Kaulkin Ginsberg and financial, accounting and business consulting leaders, Santos, Postal & Company, P.C. Through this partnership, Topline provides owners and executives with much-needed technical, financial and benchmarking services designed to improve decisions at the corporate and operational level.

For more information, contact Adam Freedenberg at AFreedenberg@santospostal.com.

 

Business Valuation: What is it, and do I need one?
http://www.insidearm.com/obs-in-focus/business-valuation-what-is-it-and-do-i-need-one/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

European ARM Giant Intrum Justitia Tallies High-Growth 2014 in Annual Report


Intrum Justitia, one of the largest debt buyers and collectors in Europe, reported strong results for the full year 2014 marked by overall company growth, both organic and through acquisitions.

The Stockholm, Sweden-based Intrum reported net earnings of $126.7 million in 2014, a 27 percent increase from 2013. Total group revenues rose 13.5 percent to $630.7 million.

Intrum noted that the increase in revenues represented organic growth of about six percent and growth from acquisitions of three percent. The remainder was due to portfolio revaluations and currency exchange effects.

The company announced two acquisitions in 2014. In October, Intrum said it was buying Danish telecom debt collection agency Advis A/S for $24.6 million. Earlier in the year, Intrum acquired Czech debt buyer Profidebt s.r.o. for $42 million.

Lars Wollung, Intrum’s President and CEO, said that two of the company’s three operational regions in Europe are driving growth. “It is mainly the Central Europe and Western Europe regions that are contributing to growth and the improvement in earnings,” said Wollung. “We are retaining a high level of profitability in Northern Europe, but the performance remains relatively unchanged compared with the year-earlier period.”

Intrum operates in more than 20 European countries and breaks down its operational regions, with business conducted on behalf of clients in and collecting from debtors in:

  • Northern Europe – Denmark, Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, and Sweden.
  • Central Europe – Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Slovakia, and Switzerland.
  • Western Europe – Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

The average number of Intrum employees for all of 2014 was 3,801, up 7.6 percent from 2013.

Intrum said that it spent $237 million on debt portfolio purchases in 2014, down about 21 percent from the previous year.

Intrum also separately announced Thursday that Alessandro Pappalardo will be appointed Director of Purchased Debt. Alessandro has been employed at Intrum Justitia since 2013, currently holding the position as Deputy Director of Purchased Debt. He has about 10 years of experience investing in European loan portfolios at Goldman Sachs. Alessandro is an Italian native with a degree in Economics from the Bocconi University.

Alessandro Pappalardo will assume his new position on February 1, 2015, succeeding Lars Wollung, Intrum’s CEO and President, who has held the role as Acting Director of Purchased Debt since April 2014.

European ARM Giant Intrum Justitia Tallies High-Growth 2014 in Annual Report
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-buying-topics/debt-buying/european-arm-giant-intrum-justitia-tallies-high-growth-2014-in-annual-report/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

DBA International Hosting Live Symposium on New York State’s Collection Rules & Regulations


DBA International is hosting a one-day comprehensive symposium on New York State’s rapidly evolving rules and regulations for the collection of debt in the Empire State. Hear directly from the representatives from the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) and New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA) as they discuss, take audience questions, and provide guidance on their new regulations and court rules which will take full effect in 2015.

Joining DFS and OCA will be a representative from the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) who will discuss the separate requirements when collecting in New York City and how the new DFS and OCA requirements interplay with the DCA requirements.

This one-day symposium will open with separate presentations by DFS General Counsel Joy Feigenbaum, OCA Deputy Counsel Anthony Galvao, and DCA General Counsel Marla Tepper.  These three keynote speakers will then participate in a live Q&A where attendees can pose questions.

The symposium continues after lunch with an industry dialogue concerning the new DFS/OCA regulations led by Irwin Kirschenbaum of Long Island based Kirschenbaum & Phillips, P.C. and Don Maurice of Maurice & Needleman. This session will discuss implementation issues that debt collectors need to pay close scrutiny to so as to avoid unintended violations, identify outstanding issues with the new rules and regulations that need further clarification or amendment and review anything new that was learned from the morning sessions with the regulatory agencies.

The day will close with representatives from DBA International’s Albany-based lobbying firm, Ostroff Associates, Inc., who will discuss issues the State Legislature is attempting to adopt in 2015 that will impact New York collections.

The symposium is recommended for all receivables management companies collecting from residents in New York State, including DBA International Members, DBA Certified Companies, Collection Law Firms, Collection Agencies, Banks/Originating Creditors, Compliance Officers, Attorneys, Collection Managers and executive level staff.

This live symposium will be on Thursday, February 26 from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the New York Marriott East Side, 525 Lexington Avenue in New York City.

Registration is available on the DBA website at www.dbainternational.org or by calling (916) 482-2462. The cost for this live event is $320 for DBA International members and $420 for non-members.

If you have questions about the New York Symposium, contact DBA’s Professional Development Manager Shannon Parod at sparod@dbainternational.org or (916) 482-2462.

About DBA International

DBA International (DBA) is the nonprofit trade association that represents the interests of more than 550 companies that purchase performing and nonperforming receivables on the secondary market. DBA’s Receivables Management Certification Program and its Code of Ethics set the “gold standard” within the receivables industry due to its rigorous uniform industry standards of best practice which focus on the protection of the consumer. DBA provides its members with extensive networking, educational, and business development opportunities in asset classes that span numerous industries. DBA continually sets the standard in the receivables management industry through its highly effective grassroots advocacy, conferences, committees, taskforces, publications, webinars, teleconferences, and breaking news alerts. Founded in 1997, DBA International is headquartered in Sacramento, California.

 

DBA International Hosting Live Symposium on New York State’s Collection Rules & Regulations

http://www.insidearm.com/daily/debt-buying-topics/debt-buying/dba-international-hosting-live-symposium-on-new-york-states-collection-rules-regulations/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

FDCPA Lawsuits Decline for Third Straight Year, But TCPA Suits Up 25%


In 2014, there were 9,720 lawsuits filed in federal courts claiming violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a decline of 5.7 percent from 2013. It was the third straight year of significant declines in consumer FDCPA case filings.

The total for 2014 also marks the first year since 2009 that total annual FDCPA filings have settled below 10,000, according to data provided by WebRecon LLC. There were 10,310 FDCPA complaints filed in court in 2013.

The 5.7 percent year-over-year decline does, however, represent a slowing in the three-year downward trend in FDCPA cases. After peaking at 12,237 cases in 2011, FDCPA suits have fallen in each subsequent year, by 7.3 percent in 2012 and 9.7 percent last year.

But the recent decline represents a correction from the sharp rise seen in FDCPA cases in the few years prior. In 2008, FDCPA cases jumped 42 percent and in 2009 the increase was 53 percent.

FDCPA-lawsuits-2004-2014

The steady decline in FDCPA lawsuits has been at least partially offset by a meteoric rise in cases claiming violations of the Telephone Consumer Protect Act (TCPA). In 2014, the total number of TCPA cases filed increased 25 percent.

But the increase for 2014 paled in comparison to the 70 percent uptick in TCPA seen in 2013.

TCPA-lawsuits-2008-2014While still far below the total volume of FDCPA suits – there were 2,336 TCPA suits filed in 2014 – the increased focus on the telephone communications statute has left many ARM companies scrambling to bring their operations into sharper compliance.

Five years ago, the TCPA was a minor blip on the radar of ARM compliance professionals. A dramatic increase in the usage of mobile phone usage in the U.S., combined with several other factors, has made the TCPA a much more enticing statute for aggrieved consumers and their legal representation.

2014 also marked the first year that TCPA lawsuits outstripped cases claiming Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) violations. While many FCRA suits target creditors, debt collectors still find FCRA claims tacked on to other lawsuits, primarily FDCPA complaints.

FDCPA Lawsuits Decline for Third Straight Year, But TCPA Suits Up 25%
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/fdcpa-lawsuits-decline-for-third-straight-year-but-tcpa-suits-up-25/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

CFPB Hits Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase for Mortgage Title Kickbacks


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Maryland Attorney General announced Thursday that they have taken action against Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase for an illegal marketing-services-kickback scheme they participated in with Genuine Title, a now-defunct title company. The Bureau and Maryland also took action against former Wells Fargo employee Todd Cohen and his wife, Elaine Oliphant Cohen, for their involvement.

Genuine Title gave the banks’ loan officers cash, marketing materials, and consumer information in exchange for business referrals. The proposed consent orders, filed in federal court, would require $24 million in civil penalties from Wells Fargo, $600,000 in civil penalties from JPMorgan Chase, and $11.1 million in redress to consumers whose loans were involved in this scheme. Cohen and Oliphant Cohen also will pay a $30,000 penalty.

“Today we took action against two of the nation’s largest banks, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, for illegal mortgage kickbacks,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “These banks allowed their loan officers to focus on their own illegal financial gain rather than on treating consumers fairly. Our action today to address these practices should serve as a warning for all those in the mortgage market.”

“Homeowners were steered toward this title company, not because they were the best or most affordable, but because they were providing kickbacks to loan officers who referred consumers to them,” said Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh. “This type of quid pro quo arrangement is illegal, and it’s unfair to other businesses that play by the rules.”

Genuine Title was a Maryland-based title company that offered real-estate-closing services from 2005 until it went out of business in April 2014. As part of the marketing-services-kickback scheme, Genuine Title offered loan officers valuable services to increase the amount of loan business generated. Genuine Title conducted this scheme at several financial institutions. The services the company offered included purchasing, analyzing, and providing data on consumers and creating letters with the banks’ logos that the company had printed, folded, stuffed into envelopes, and mailed. In return, the banks’ loan officers would increase Genuine Title’s profits by referring homebuyers to the company for closing services. This scheme was especially profitable for the loan officers, who generally are paid by commission.

The marketing-services-kickback scheme violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), which prohibits giving a “fee, kickback, or thing of value” in exchange for a referral of business related to a real-estate-settlement service.

Wells Fargo

The Bureau’s investigation identified more than 100 Wells Fargo loan officers in at least 18 branches, largely in Maryland and Virginia, who participated in this scheme. The Bureau alleges that these loan officers referred thousands of loans to Genuine Title over the course of the scheme. The Bureau alleges that, despite the fact that Wells Fargo had multiple warnings of the illegal arrangements between its loan officers and Genuine Title – including a federal lawsuit explicitly alleging the existence of such agreements – the bank failed to take action to stop the practices and did not have an adequate system in place to identify these violations. Under the proposed consent order filed today, Wells Fargo would be required to pay $10.8 million in redress and $24 million in civil penalties. The Bureau also filed an administrative consent order against Wells Fargo prohibiting future violations.

Wells Fargo employed Todd Cohen as a loan officer from April 2009 through August 2010. The Bureau alleges that, while at Wells Fargo, Cohen not only received marketing materials, he also took substantial cash payments in exchange for referrals. Rather than pay Cohen directly, Genuine Title made payments to Cohen’s then-girlfriend, now-wife, Elaine Oliphant Cohen, in an effort to disguise the kickback nature of the payment. She received tens of thousands of dollars in payments for loans Cohen referred to Genuine Title. Under the proposed consent order filed today, Cohen and Oliphant Cohen would be required to pay a civil penalty of $30,000, and Cohen would be banned from participation in the mortgage industry for two years.

JPMorgan Chase

The CFPB also found that loan officers at JPMorgan Chase participated in the marketing-services-kickback scheme with Genuine Title. The Bureau alleges that at least six Chase loan officers in three different branches in Maryland, Virginia, and New York were involved. These officers referred settlement business to Genuine Title on almost 200 loans. The Bureau also alleges that Chase did not have an adequate system in place to ensure that its loan officers were following the law. Under the proposed consent order filed today, Chase would pay approximately $300,000 in redress and $600,000 in civil penalties. The Bureau also filed an administrative consent order against Chase prohibiting future violations.

In addition to the loan officers at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, several loan officers at another financial institution also participated in the scheme with Genuine Title. While Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase did not identify or address the illegal conduct, that institution self-identified the problematic practices and terminated the loan officers involved. The institution also cooperated with the CFPB’s investigation and self-initiated a remediation plan. Based on the institution’s behavior, the CFPB has resolved that investigation without an enforcement action, consistent with the CFPB’s Bulletin on Responsible Business Conduct.

The actions were the result of a joint investigation by the CFPB, the State of Maryland, and the Maryland Insurance Administration, which regulates title insurance providers such as Genuine Title.

The CFPB’s complaint is available here.

The proposed consent orders filed in federal court are available for Wells Fargo here  and for JPMorgan Chase here.

 

CFPB Hits Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase for Mortgage Title Kickbacks
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/collection-laws-regulations/collection-laws-and-regulations/cfpb-hits-wells-fargo-and-jpmorgan-chase-for-mortgage-title-kickbacks/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management

Altus President Thomas E. Brenan Inducted as New President of International Association of Commercial Collectors


Altus Global Trade Solutions President, Thomas E. Brenan, was inducted as the incoming president of the International Association of Commercial Collectors (IACC) at a ceremony held at The James Royal Palm Wednesday night in Miami, Fla. The Board of Directors, elected by fellow association members, serves as leaders and provides guidance and strategic direction for the association.

“It is an extreme honor to be selected to this prestigious position by my peers,” said Brenan, Altus President. “As I reflect on the IACC’s past leadership and achievements, I understand that there is a very high standard to uphold. I guarantee my best efforts to build upon those accomplishments and to further IACC as the dominant association in the collection industry.”

In his role as President, Brenan will be responsible for representing the organization as top executive, appointing all board members to chairman of standing committees and presiding over all association and board meetings.  Brenan, alongside the executive team, will continue to cultivate the growth of the organization through strategic communication and support to member agencies when requested.

“The commercial collection industry is experiencing many changes and it is an exciting time to lead the IACC,” said Brenan.

About IACC

The International Association of Commercial Collectors, Inc. (IACC) is an international trade association comprised of more than 300 commercial collection agencies, attorneys, law lists and vendors. With members throughout the U.S. and in 25 international countries, IACC is the largest organization of commercial collection specialists in the world. The IACC contributes to the growth and profitability of its members by delivering essential educational and professional tools and services in a highly collaborative and participatory environment.

About Altus

As a member of the Natixus network, Altus provides commercial debt recovery services to more than 100,000 customers in the United States and abroad. The company is a comprehensive, full service receivable management agency offering receivable management outsourcing, domestic and international commercial collections, audit collection, and business receivable management training.

Altus is fully licensed and bonded in all required jurisdictions. It is also a member of the Commercial Law League of America, the Commercial Collections Agency Association of the Commercial Law League of America, and a member of the International Association of Commercial Collectors.

Founded in 1994, Altus is headquartered in Kenner, La., with branch offices in Colorado, Washington and New Jersey. Visit us at www.TrustAltus.com.

Altus President Thomas E. Brenan Inducted as New President of International Association of Commercial Collectors
http://www.insidearm.com/daily/commercial-b2b-receivables/commercial-debt-collection/altus-president-thomas-e-brenan-inducted-as-new-president-of-international-association-of-commercial-collectors/
http://www.insidearm.com/feed
insideARM

Accounts Receivable Management